Does Your UI Test Automation Strategy Have These Gaps?


Automation in software testing represents an evolutionary step in this technical domain. Leaders of testing profess such that evolution is in process and the assertion stems from a deficit in the skills required for building automated tests that provide higher levels of value for client organizations. Therefore, an awareness of potential gaps and lacunae in test automation frameworks is necessary to ensure the perfect test automation strategy.

Expending Excess Time Maintaining Test Scripts

Heavy investments of time, effort, and energy in creating test scripts indicate sub-par practices in a UI test automation strategy. The root cause is usually improper planning and poor structuring of testing frameworks. Therefore, testing engineers working with an automation testing company can breakdown tests into smaller test cases to promote efficiency in testing services. Smaller test cases offer the benefit of easy integration of user flow changes and promote reusability of fully functional test cases in new testing scenarios.

UI Test Automation Strategy

Negligible Mobile Browser Testing

Mobile browsers generate incrementally higher volumes of Internet traffic. This fact in the digital domain should encourage testers of a test automation company to focus testing on mobile devices, systems, browsers, and services. Further, the multiplicity of portable connected devices should prompt a greater focus on testing different brands of mobile browsers such as Google Chrome, Apple Safari, and Firefox. This would enable testers to partner with clients in building their businesses while ensuring quality control for mobile applications. Additionally, professional testing offered by a test automation company helps identify issues before potential customers face a ruined mobile experience.

Lack of Options in Test Environments

A test environment simulates a production environment (or a real environment) thereby enabling testers to plan and execute testing activities with conditions and factors of the real environment. The intent is to evaluate the working of a software product in the real world. Different test environments render computer code in different ways and therefore an ideal UI test automation strategy must include a maximum number of test environments. These may replicate the working of different devices and browsers, enabling test engineers to unearth bugs and remediate these before the software product reaches the market to customers.

Ignoring Parallel Testing

Parallel testing techniques are necessary when a company seeks to widen test coverage inside constrained timelines. This testing technique implies testing multiple applications or sub-components of an application concurrently to reduce testing times. Parallel tests typically consist of two or more parts that check different parts or functional characteristics of an application. Further, parallel testing allows testers to significantly reduce the hours it would normally take to run one test after another. By testing multiple configurations simultaneously, testers can condense 30 hours of testing to 10 hours, on three different machines. Parallel testing therefore helps reduce the time spent on running tests, resulting in significant cost and time savings.

In Conclusion

Addressing these gaps can drive higher levels of efficiency in a modern UI test automation strategy. It is critical for test engineers to improve their performance on the job and deliver client satisfaction at a higher level, to remain relevant in a highly competitive market. It is best to work with experts and highly experienced testers to get the maximum ROI – connect with us for all this and more.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *