Exploratory testing is an approach that software testing teams use emphasizing rapid cycling of test design, execution, analysis, and learning. It is often contrasted with scenario testing, which is a more laid out approach tackling one possible issue at a time. Organizations with enough resources and time can hire a software testing company for both scenario and exploratory testing since this ensures more reliable results.
Sometimes, though, a company chooses exploratory testing because it has a tight schedule or a limited budget. Sometimes, the project does not require a complex writing process, or there is not enough documentation about the project. Whatever the reason for an exploratory test, here are practices all software testing companies using this method should observe.
Ensure there are adequate resources
When launching an exploratory testing phase, you should have the right personnel. A tester should have bug-hunting experience; testers must know how to understand and analyze digital products for risks. They need to be autonomous and multi-skilled since they will be cycling among several testing stages.
Testers should also know how to improvise and have good observational skills. They need to know which new analyses they must deploy based on the information they are gathering with each test.
Prepare tests, the time for testing, and scope
Preparing for a test requires structure and preparation. If the product had undergone previous tests, there should be a bug and common default classification. This log serves as baseline documentation for the software testing services provider to refer to when they begin.
The testers also need a product presentation before their mission starts. A presentation helps them understand the end user’s experience and gives them a few starting points or testing ideas. The presentation also mentions aspects that need attention.
After the preparations, testers should get a time frame and scope for the tests. Should the campaign carry out a full audit, or is this for specific functionality? Having a time frame and scope allows testers to optimize their resources and the test types they will use. Preparing also ensures that they do not test evolving perimeters.
Aim for focused, not broad testing
Test according to the campaign’s requirements; do not test for the sake of it. Some campaigns need to address critical risks, while others are for continuous improvement projects like hunting for hidden bugs.
Create a report and debrief the testers
Bug reports list details and incidents encountered in the process. For exploratory testing, creating bug reports is challenging. Testers must pay attention to how they communicate results. They need to talk about the rationale behind the test, the steps they took, the conditions under which they carried the test out, the scope, and the test results. Only then can they provide recommendations. Once the testers have provided the bug report and their feedback, they will receive a debriefing on the campaign.
An exploratory test focuses on investigating and discovering a digital product’s ergonomic, graphical, and functional capabilities. Since it relies on contingent events, exploratory tests rely on the campaign head’s ability to lay the campaign’s groundwork. He must know how to explain to his testing team why this analysis is necessary, analyze results, and debrief the participants after their missions.
Consult Codoid today to see if exploratory testing is right for your software. We provide a range of top tier QA services, and we are an industry leader among software testing companies. Tell us about your project today; contact us for inquiries!