Reasons why E2E E-Learning Fails: Challenges and Limitations - Codoid
Select Page
ELearning Testing

Reasons why E2E E-Learning Fails: Challenges and Limitations

End-to-end e-learning can pose its challenges and limitations to training managers.

Reasons why E2E E-Learning Fails: Challenges and Limitations

When it comes to training executives, e-learning can be a challenging task at hand. Organizations are often compelled to look beyond end-to-end e-learning because the current working environment demonstrates several challenges. End-to-end e-learning is a very incumbent and lengthy process and entails a prolonged development time, which usually ranges from two to four months.

Training managers are often forced to look for convenient alternatives. In this blog, we will further understand the challenges and limitations of end-to-end e-learning and the reasons why managers are often not able to meet them. However, if you do plan to introduce an end-to-end e-learning model in your organization, undertake an ELearning testing or employ ELearning Testing Services to assess the viability of your module.

We will begin this informational journey by explaining to you the process of end-to-end e-learning.

The Process

End-to-end e-learning involves formulating a storyboard that defines on-screen content for each user, including texts, media, graphics, and illustrations. The storyboard is further backed by an audio script that explains the entire training process step-by-step. This whole module is developed by an instructional designer who is further assisted by a graphic designer to create visual assets. Authoring experts then develop the course, following the storyboard as the blueprint. Therefore, the development of the module requires a series of experts who will have to play their part proficiently.

Projects suited for end-to-end e-learning are the ones that are sourced with extensive budgets and indefinite deadlines. Moreover, assignments that might require end-to-end e-learning include intensive interactivities and simulations such as industrial control systems, flight simulators, or the jobs involving induction training.

Limitations and Challenges

Any reader could have grasped that end-to-end e-learning is suitable for organizations that can spare extensive budgets and provide indefinite or at least protracted deadlines. The elaborate storyboarding of content and numerous specifications, interactions, and iterations make it a complicated process and is often not fitting for an enterprise that has just rolled out for business. The audio script for an end-to-end e-learning module usually involves conversations between the client and the developer, the process of transcribing for which consumes massive time.

Arguments and Oppositions

1. Conversion of ILT to Classroom Training Module

If an organization faces the immediate need to convert an ILT program into classroom training, the end-to-end process is not viable since its development will consume enormous time. Besides, for establishing a comprehensive classroom training module, information or raw material will be readily available in PowerPoint slides, so there is absolutely no need to go through an elaborate process and create something convoluted when a more comfortable, more convenient option is available.

In such a conversion, the following e-learning activities are accomplished even before the development process starts:

  • Analyzing the target audience and laying a foundation accordingly
  • Content research and curation for providing comprehensive and valuable information
  • Finalization of learning outcomes and strategies
  • Organization and designing of learning content and activities
  • Development of assessment mechanisms

Once these steps are completed, there will virtually be no need to go through an entire development process. Courses can be developed at a faster pace while employing lower costs.

2. Costly Development

When you need to develop courses on a strict budget, end-to-end e-learning is not for you since it entails higher formulation costs. The involvement of several resources and the utilization of complex simulations and interactivities only add to the budget, thereby increasing the outlay.

3. Courses in Different Languages

Creating a course in multiple languages has become a necessity now. Due to globalization, various individuals belonging to different nationalities avail online courses. End-to-end e-learning can be used for translation and localization of courses. If you want to formulate a multilingual course, you will need to expend more resources and devote extra time and energy.

4. Updating Courses

When you want to update or modify a course in line with the recent developments or alterations, the higher cost of operating an e-learning module will make you think twice before you employ the method. Your upgrade requirements can range from software updates for industrial training software or changes in rules during compliance training. Therefore, for courses that reflect dynamic behavior, end-to-end e-learning might not be a viable technique.

5. Re-branding Existing Courses

Since companies undergo constant changes due to internal and external factors, their branding guidelines often endure modifications. Therefore, service enterprises that deal with constantly altering products must think twice before employing end-to-end e-learning to develop their course requirements. Experts recommend that companies like these should look for an alternative that is cost-efficient and involves minimal time. Consequently, if you think that your enterprise modules require consistent re-branding, then looking for an option that will not cost you massively is the only prudent solution.

To wrap it up

End-to-end e-learning can pose problems for organizations that are looking for budget course modules in a specific timeframe. If your enterprise involves dynamic training requirements, you must look beyond end-to-end e-learning and settle on something financially and spatially feasible. You can consider rapid e-learning for formulating comprehensive class training courses. The method involves quirky ways through which you can efficiently train your employees. You don’t require end-to-end e-learning for creating courses exclusively. As discussed above, it is only suitable for organizations that can afford to spend large outlays and provide an indefinite timeframe for formulation.

However, regardless of the method you choose, you must undertake a prudent ELearning App testing if you plan to roll out your module on mobile devices. Software testing is crucial since you certainly do not want problems once the application or course has been launched. End-to-end e-learning can pose its challenges and limitations to training managers. Still, there are alternatives available in the market that you can help you get through the process in time while considering your budgetary threshold. You can consider all reasons why end-to-end e-learning fails but always remember that there is one right option always available that will suit your business just right.

Written By

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


When it comes to training executives, e-learning can be a challenging task at hand. Organizations are often compelled to look beyond end-to-end e-learning because the current working environment demonstrates several challenges. End-to-end e-learning is a very incumbent and lengthy process and entails a prolonged development time, which usually ranges from two to four months.

Training managers are often forced to look for convenient alternatives. In this blog, we will further understand the challenges and limitations of end-to-end e-learning and the reasons why managers are often not able to meet them. However, if you do plan to introduce an end-to-end e-learning model in your organization, undertake an ELearning testing or employ ELearning Testing Services to assess the viability of your module.

We will begin this informational journey by explaining to you the process of end-to-end e-learning.

The Process

End-to-end e-learning involves formulating a storyboard that defines on-screen content for each user, including texts, media, graphics, and illustrations. The storyboard is further backed by an audio script that explains the entire training process step-by-step. This whole module is developed by an instructional designer who is further assisted by a graphic designer to create visual assets. Authoring experts then develop the course, following the storyboard as the blueprint. Therefore, the development of the module requires a series of experts who will have to play their part proficiently.

Projects suited for end-to-end e-learning are the ones that are sourced with extensive budgets and indefinite deadlines. Moreover, assignments that might require end-to-end e-learning include intensive interactivities and simulations such as industrial control systems, flight simulators, or the jobs involving induction training.

Limitations and Challenges

Any reader could have grasped that end-to-end e-learning is suitable for organizations that can spare extensive budgets and provide indefinite or at least protracted deadlines. The elaborate storyboarding of content and numerous specifications, interactions, and iterations make it a complicated process and is often not fitting for an enterprise that has just rolled out for business. The audio script for an end-to-end e-learning module usually involves conversations between the client and the developer, the process of transcribing for which consumes massive time.

Arguments and Oppositions

1. Conversion of ILT to Classroom Training Module

If an organization faces the immediate need to convert an ILT program into classroom training, the end-to-end process is not viable since its development will consume enormous time. Besides, for establishing a comprehensive classroom training module, information or raw material will be readily available in PowerPoint slides, so there is absolutely no need to go through an elaborate process and create something convoluted when a more comfortable, more convenient option is available.

In such a conversion, the following e-learning activities are accomplished even before the development process starts:

  • Analyzing the target audience and laying a foundation accordingly
  • Content research and curation for providing comprehensive and valuable information
  • Finalization of learning outcomes and strategies
  • Organization and designing of learning content and activities
  • Development of assessment mechanisms

Once these steps are completed, there will virtually be no need to go through an entire development process. Courses can be developed at a faster pace while employing lower costs.

2. Costly Development

When you need to develop courses on a strict budget, end-to-end e-learning is not for you since it entails higher formulation costs. The involvement of several resources and the utilization of complex simulations and interactivities only add to the budget, thereby increasing the outlay.

3. Courses in Different Languages

Creating a course in multiple languages has become a necessity now. Due to globalization, various individuals belonging to different nationalities avail online courses. End-to-end e-learning can be used for translation and localization of courses. If you want to formulate a multilingual course, you will need to expend more resources and devote extra time and energy.

4. Updating Courses

When you want to update or modify a course in line with the recent developments or alterations, the higher cost of operating an e-learning module will make you think twice before you employ the method. Your upgrade requirements can range from software updates for industrial training software or changes in rules during compliance training. Therefore, for courses that reflect dynamic behavior, end-to-end e-learning might not be a viable technique.

5. Re-branding Existing Courses

Since companies undergo constant changes due to internal and external factors, their branding guidelines often endure modifications. Therefore, service enterprises that deal with constantly altering products must think twice before employing end-to-end e-learning to develop their course requirements. Experts recommend that companies like these should look for an alternative that is cost-efficient and involves minimal time. Consequently, if you think that your enterprise modules require consistent re-branding, then looking for an option that will not cost you massively is the only prudent solution.

To wrap it up

End-to-end e-learning can pose problems for organizations that are looking for budget course modules in a specific timeframe. If your enterprise involves dynamic training requirements, you must look beyond end-to-end e-learning and settle on something financially and spatially feasible. You can consider rapid e-learning for formulating comprehensive class training courses. The method involves quirky ways through which you can efficiently train your employees. You don’t require end-to-end e-learning for creating courses exclusively. As discussed above, it is only suitable for organizations that can afford to spend large outlays and provide an indefinite timeframe for formulation.

However, regardless of the method you choose, you must undertake a prudent ELearning App testing if you plan to roll out your module on mobile devices. Software testing is crucial since you certainly do not want problems once the application or course has been launched. End-to-end e-learning can pose its challenges and limitations to training managers. Still, there are alternatives available in the market that you can help you get through the process in time while considering your budgetary threshold. You can consider all reasons why end-to-end e-learning fails but always remember that there is one right option always available that will suit your business just right.