Should Trivial Code be tested? - Codoid
Select Page
Codoid Blog

Should Trivial Code be tested?

Irrespective of the business that your client is in, marketing is an integral part of their operations. In fact, in this day and age of social.

Trivial code, as the name implies, refers to computer code that governs the performance of minor aspects of a web page or a software application. These could include invoice dates, the number of a purchase order, the value of a buy order, and other such factors. Veterans in the domain of Software Testing recommend the execution of functional tests on such code. Other members of the testing fraternity assert testers must execute Software Testing on trivial code only in case of an express requirement to do so. However, an overwhelming majority of the testing community holds that trivial code may undergo evolution and gain heft in terms of importance; therefore, such code merits functional testing in the early stages of its digital existence.

Small, Formalized Testing

This approach finds a primary plank in the assumption: no code is trivial. The advocates of this approach state that Software Testing is the cause, and the implementation of such testing comprises the effect. Therefore, per this approach, the term ‘trivial’ does not emerge in the context of modern Software Testing initiatives. Champions of this school of thought also argue the term ‘trivial code’ is misleading and can trigger serious damage should newbie testers encounter the term during their learning phases. This approach also advocates testing code in small, formalized steps that add value to the overall Software Testing initiative.

Should Trivial Code be tested

Tests provide Feedback

This represents a critical input when testing professionals working on behalf of a Software Testing Company conduct test exercises. Those that endorse this approach to Software Testing value the feedback gained from testing exercises. The resulting information can be deployed to refine a body of computer code or upgrade the status of a software testing matrix above the mundane. Therefore, this approach negates the notions of some testers who ridicule writing Software Testing scripts for trivial code or automatic properties engineered into a software application or package.

Overall Behavior of a System

Trivial code can ensure smooth execution of the overall functionality of a system. This critical learning negates the original question as to whether such code should undergo testing. For instance, code that governs a single property, such as setting the correct date inside a digital trade document, can wreak havoc should it undergo systematic malfunction. Another instance emerges when we consider the ‘minimize’ button in a browser window. Any malfunction in such functionality can mar the user experience, therefore creating a solid business case for Software Testing of these minor functions.

Overall Behavior of a System

Manual and Automated

Both these methods of Software Testing should be deployed when test professionals verify the functionality of trivial code. Veteran testers assert that the use of automated tools allow testers to expand the scope of Software Testing to every bit of computer code that animates a software application. Further, said testers advocate both manual and automated methods may be used because of the distinctions in outcomes. For instance, Software Testing of trivial code using manual testing methods may unearth deficiencies in functionality overlooked by automated testing. In addition, professional test engineers favor mechanisms that detect instances when trivial code transforms into mainstream functionality inside a package.

Mutation Testing

This technique evaluates the quality of Software Testing undertaken by testing professionals. Such testing methods introduce deliberate glitches into source code and then the tests are executed. The resulting failures point to the areas of code that need re-structuring or re-compilation. Such testing, when applied to trivial code, assist testing professionals to verify the robustness of such code. The outcomes of mutation testing also indicate the quality of unit tests being administered to a body of computer code.

Code written by Third Parties

This represents an interesting scenario wherein Software Testing professionals set out to test trivial code developed by third parties. At one level, testing professionals should inculcate the stance to execute wide-ranging tests; at another level, they may work to test trivial code developed by third parties as part of their commitment to guarantee an excellent end-user experience. Some commentators in the Software Testing domain note that this represents an artificial distinction that has no bearing in the real world. However, others view this distinction as important to efforts that drive comprehensive Software Testing regimens.

In Conclusion

The thoughts and views encapsulated reinforce the impression that no code is trivial. The Software Testing community must understand and appreciate the view that every piece of code makes a significant contribution to the overall performance of the larger application. Hence, trivial code (and its many variations) deserves their full attention in the interests of ensuring flawless bodies of computer code that trigger high levels of satisfaction among end-users at all levels. We are veteran testers and have experts in every realm of testing. Connect with us to gain the advantages.

Written By

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Trivial code, as the name implies, refers to computer code that governs the performance of minor aspects of a web page or a software application. These could include invoice dates, the number of a purchase order, the value of a buy order, and other such factors. Veterans in the domain of Software Testing recommend the execution of functional tests on such code. Other members of the testing fraternity assert testers must execute Software Testing on trivial code only in case of an express requirement to do so. However, an overwhelming majority of the testing community holds that trivial code may undergo evolution and gain heft in terms of importance; therefore, such code merits functional testing in the early stages of its digital existence.

Small, Formalized Testing

This approach finds a primary plank in the assumption: no code is trivial. The advocates of this approach state that Software Testing is the cause, and the implementation of such testing comprises the effect. Therefore, per this approach, the term ‘trivial’ does not emerge in the context of modern Software Testing initiatives. Champions of this school of thought also argue the term ‘trivial code’ is misleading and can trigger serious damage should newbie testers encounter the term during their learning phases. This approach also advocates testing code in small, formalized steps that add value to the overall Software Testing initiative.

Should Trivial Code be tested

Tests provide Feedback

This represents a critical input when testing professionals working on behalf of a Software Testing Company conduct test exercises. Those that endorse this approach to Software Testing value the feedback gained from testing exercises. The resulting information can be deployed to refine a body of computer code or upgrade the status of a software testing matrix above the mundane. Therefore, this approach negates the notions of some testers who ridicule writing Software Testing scripts for trivial code or automatic properties engineered into a software application or package.

Overall Behavior of a System

Trivial code can ensure smooth execution of the overall functionality of a system. This critical learning negates the original question as to whether such code should undergo testing. For instance, code that governs a single property, such as setting the correct date inside a digital trade document, can wreak havoc should it undergo systematic malfunction. Another instance emerges when we consider the ‘minimize’ button in a browser window. Any malfunction in such functionality can mar the user experience, therefore creating a solid business case for Software Testing of these minor functions.

Overall Behavior of a System

Manual and Automated

Both these methods of Software Testing should be deployed when test professionals verify the functionality of trivial code. Veteran testers assert that the use of automated tools allow testers to expand the scope of Software Testing to every bit of computer code that animates a software application. Further, said testers advocate both manual and automated methods may be used because of the distinctions in outcomes. For instance, Software Testing of trivial code using manual testing methods may unearth deficiencies in functionality overlooked by automated testing. In addition, professional test engineers favor mechanisms that detect instances when trivial code transforms into mainstream functionality inside a package.

Mutation Testing

This technique evaluates the quality of Software Testing undertaken by testing professionals. Such testing methods introduce deliberate glitches into source code and then the tests are executed. The resulting failures point to the areas of code that need re-structuring or re-compilation. Such testing, when applied to trivial code, assist testing professionals to verify the robustness of such code. The outcomes of mutation testing also indicate the quality of unit tests being administered to a body of computer code.

Code written by Third Parties

This represents an interesting scenario wherein Software Testing professionals set out to test trivial code developed by third parties. At one level, testing professionals should inculcate the stance to execute wide-ranging tests; at another level, they may work to test trivial code developed by third parties as part of their commitment to guarantee an excellent end-user experience. Some commentators in the Software Testing domain note that this represents an artificial distinction that has no bearing in the real world. However, others view this distinction as important to efforts that drive comprehensive Software Testing regimens.

In Conclusion

The thoughts and views encapsulated reinforce the impression that no code is trivial. The Software Testing community must understand and appreciate the view that every piece of code makes a significant contribution to the overall performance of the larger application. Hence, trivial code (and its many variations) deserves their full attention in the interests of ensuring flawless bodies of computer code that trigger high levels of satisfaction among end-users at all levels. We are veteran testers and have experts in every realm of testing. Connect with us to gain the advantages.