Test automation success can be achieved by determining its goals


Ask yourself, what do you want out of the test automation process? Without identifying your goals for test automation, you can't succeed. You should define your goals by a set of gauges called success criteria since every team is different. Every stage of maturity in the process of finance, regulation, technology, and skill should be appropriately assessed.

Test Automation Success achieved

Let's see how your success criteria can be converted to success with your testing teams shifting to automation. Is it your default practice? Don't automate every test, but at the same time, it is highly beneficial if you automate tests by answering the question of why we should not automate it. The constant churning of code will help, and many teams experience that in trying to define, redefine, and implement standards for automation, they end up saving time. Learn new skills and automation techniques to create a list of conditions needed to use your current automation abilities.

Automated tests are nothing but clients of a System Under Test (SUT). Check if your automated tests/test clients execute anywhere and at any time because sometimes constraints can force these tests to run in a specific environment. Automated tests run on different machines and can quickly determine the devices it works on so that you fix it for those it doesn't. Developers should run tests on their devices and use them for debugging. While testers, analysts, and product managers should be able to access tests and question aspects of the application. If tests are flexible, it will allow information to be gathered about the SUT by having test-client code executed on various devices and teams working through the environmental constraints.

Tests should continue to execute without any human intervention, and you shouldn't have to push more than one button to get it going. Did you do anything before decision-makers could view the reports or before you started the tests? If yes, then you're not meeting the set criterion. Run tests frequently because when automation is not run automatically against changing code, it is not an efficient setup, and you won't get credible results. Have unit tests and test your automation and system often, through scheduled runs. Continuous Integration (CI) should bedone to test automation, just like compilers check code and ensure that tests run publicly. If a test case that failed once passes during a rerun, double-check the defect that showed up in the first instance, because good testers don't ignore anomalies. Communicate what should be changed in your application by coding tolerance for it. Make your testing reliable and trustworthy for it to be considered successful.

Inferior automation can drive automation engineers to waste time debugging code rather than provide timely, accurate information to developers and other stakeholders. Your automation engineers should focus on building new tests instead of maintaining existing automation. If automation needs codebases, environments, agents, and systems, we should free them up and not hinder the process by being ready for testing all the time. Sincere and transparent test automation reports will help your developers act quickly. Ensure they produce multiple test cases per day to check if there are problems with the commitment to the automation and testing process.

Reassess agent roles and responsibilities by updating automation goals and treat it as a development activity. Someone on the team must be accountable for fixing issues with automation because when no one owns it, automation fails. Your automation team should use the best practices of software development. Testers should store automation in source code control, maintain existing automation, plan for future automation, and fix failing tests immediately. Consider technical debt for test automation and account for automation by adhering to coding standards and practices.

Create test automation before, or in parallel with test code. A different vision of success for each team will help you assess if your team is ready. If the team is, then you'll be prepared to work in a Continuous Delivery (CD) world, and your end-users will get reliable, precise, and on-time insight into your applications. QA companies like Codoid , have adapted its practices to help its clients strategize goals to achieve a successful implementation of their automation testing services.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *