CASE STUDY

Flawless QA for Rail eLearning Content

Ensuring instructional integrity, regulatory compliance, and a flawless learner experience for safety-critical training through expert content validation and cognitive testing.

E – LEARNING

ABOUT THE PROJECT

Precision Validation of Mission-Critical Training Content

A UK private railway network developed a vast library of over 30 mandatory compliance courses, from Track Safety and ETCS to Occupational Health. Each course was a complex interactive module combining videos, quizzes, drag-and-drop activities, real incident analyses, and final certification. Our mandate was to act as the final instructional gatekeeper, ensuring every piece of content was not just functionally sound but also pedagogically accurate, compliant, and flawless before release to thousands of rail employees.

HIGHLIGHTS

30+

compliance course

1,200+

interactive elements tested

280+ content & instructional defects resolved
Zero post-launch errors in scoring, certificates, or compliance content
40% of critical issues found through Exploratory Learner-Path Analysis

Tools we Used

PROBLEM STATEMENT

The High Cost of Instructional Error in Safety-Critical Training

Deploying a library of 30+ legally required training courses presented steep challenges. Unlike functional bugs, instructional errors in safety-critical content could cause compliance violations or real-world risks. Misaligned quiz logic, unsynchronized media, or incorrect safety data would undermine both learner comprehension and regulatory defensibility. Additionally, the fast-paced, weekly release cycles required a scalable, highly accurate QA process that could adapt to complex interactive modules and ensure zero-defect output at launch.

OUR SOLUTION

The Content Cognition Validation Framework

Verified every course matched official regulatory safety standards.
Tested quiz logic using smart and wrong answers.
Audited assessment scoring accuracy across all formats.
Checked full synchronization of video, audio, and interactivity.
Simulated diverse learner actions and device switches.
Validated certificates and course progress across platforms.

What we did?

Ensured Legal Accuracy

Validated Instructional Logic

Simulated Real Usage

Streamlined QA Process

Ensured Legal Accuracy

We cross-referenced course content with regulatory documents and engineering standards. For instance, diagrams in "DC Conductor Rail" were validated against real schematics, ensuring error-free visuals. Every quiz or lesson had a mapped checklist to confirm legal mandates were not just mentioned but also tested.

Validated Instructional Logic

Our team validated not just correct answers but also intelligent wrong answers to catch quiz flaws. In "Signal Engineering," drag-and-drop scenarios were tested for multiple valid solutions, while scoring audits verified the fairness and accuracy of all assessments.

Simulated Real Usage

We mimicked the behavior of novice and experienced learners, switching devices mid-course or pausing sessions for 24 hours. Our simulations revealed hidden state save issues and media sync problems. This ensured continuity and trust in the platform’s user experience.

Streamlined QA Process

We created detailed test charts per course, focusing on unique risks. Testing phases aligned with development sprints, and feedback loops were fast and structured. Annotated screenshots and priority tagging enabled rapid developer turnaround, allowing all courses to meet strict 7-day rollout deadlines.

Talk to our Experts

Amazing clients who
trust us