As a business practice, software testing services must follow procedures defined by standard operating procedure (SOPs). These sets of actions are critical because they allow software testers to deliver consistent quality output with increased productivity. In this context, proof of concept emerges as an important step that guarantees certain assurances to customers and clients. A Proof of Concept (PoC) demonstration is the process through which a software testing company tests the veracity and achievability of a proposed task or process. This demonstration convinces a potential client that the company in question can deliver actionable results within stipulated timelines.
Documenting a Shift
A Proof of Concept document may emerge when an organization undertakes to shift to automation testing practices. This shift from manual testing systems and practices may be undertaken in response to client requirements, shifts in software testing systems and practices, and growing demand for automation in software testing. In such a situation, a Proof of Concept document may outline a complete feasibility analysis report that justifies this shift. The document may outline the top three or top five tools required for automated software testing.
Planning for a Proof of Concept Document
Organizations that wish to elevate their software testing systems and practices must invest organizational resources in the creation of a Proof of Concept document. The planners may elect to design a time frame that ranges from a few hours to a few weeks, a certain quantum of company information, working space inside the offices of the organization, technical resources, trained manpower, etc. These elements, when expertly marshalled, can empower the creation of a Proof of Concept document for software testing service providers.
Best Practices
Serious preparations are necessary when software testing organizations (or the concerned division inside an organization) set about the task of defining a Proof of Concept document. Planning certainly plays a critical role, but stellar execution is necessary to create an outstanding document. In line with this, organizational actors can consult with experts, read various case studies, and seek insights from the experience of other players in the software testing domain. These preparations and the attendant best practices may generate a competent Proof of Concept document.
Dealing with Uncertainty
Current, or ongoing, projects may not be suitable for a Proof of Concept demonstration. In line with this, software testing personnel must realize that certain testing tasks do not lend themselves well to the demands of such demonstration. Hence, business operators and software testing companies must work to modulate the expectations of clients when the latter demand a Proof of Concept for ongoing projects. However, testing operators may undertake to demonstrate certain aspects of such exercises to satisfy a client’s demand. Said operators can also undertake to provide deeper assurances about demonstrating Proof of Concept for fresh projects that hinge on software testing activities.
Ideal Candidates for Proof of Concept
Certain parameters define the suitability of projects that can be showcased in a Proof of Concept document. For instance, long-term projects are ideally suited for software testing automation; this factor defines duration as a short-term or a long-term exhibit inside a PoC document. In addition, the use of regression in software testing represents another factor that demonstrates key aspects of a Proof of Concept document. The stability of an application casts an outsize impact on its selection for a PoC document. In light of the above, software testing businesses should decide on the choice of projects that will demonstrate Proof of Concept.
Technical Parameters
The shift to automation in software testing must be underlaid by favorable technical parameters to ensure the success of a Proof of Concept document. In line with this, QA teams must assess and evaluate: the platform and OS testing matrix, data-driven capability of the tool, reporting capability and report portability, debugging and logging issues, support for version control, etc. Once these parameters are validated for a certain project, software testing teams can proceed with outlining and developing a Proof of Concept document.
Results of Proof of Concept
Once completed, the Proof of Concept document must demonstrate a litany of positive factors. These include the costs of implementation, support costs, the scope for consultation in a project, the use of open source tools, learning curve, the use of various learning resources, etc. An analysis of these factors allows testers to assess whether the Proof of Concept satisfies client requirements and the particulars of a certain project.
In Conclusion:
While Proof of Concept is helpful, it may not always be possible for all projects – especially when the tasks need to be performed/demonstrated. However, where possible, Proof of Concept can be highly beneficial to the client and the company offering it. It provides an in-depth understanding of the project including the benefits and costs. Connect with our experts to know how you can benefit and take your projects to the next level of success.
Comments(0)