Locator Labs: A Practical Approach to Building Stable Automation Locators

Anyone with experience in UI automation has likely encountered a familiar frustration: Tests fail even though the application itself is functioning correctly. The button still exists, the form submits as expected, and the user journey remains intact, yet the automation breaks because an element cannot be located. These failures often trigger debates about tooling and infrastructure. Is Selenium inherently unstable? Would Playwright be more reliable? Should the test suite be rewritten in a different language? In most cases, these questions miss the real issue. Such failures rarely stem from the automation testing framework itself. More often, they are the result of poorly constructed locators. This is where the mindset behind Locator Labs becomes valuable, not as a product pitch, but as an engineering philosophy. The core idea is to invest slightly more time and thought when creating locators so that long-term maintenance becomes significantly easier. Locators are treated as durable automation assets, not disposable strings copied directly from the DOM.

This article examines the underlying practice it represents: why disciplined locator design matters, how a structured approach reduces fragility, and how supportive tooling can improve decision-making without replacing sound engineering judgment.

The Real Issue: Automation Rarely Breaks Because of Code

Most automation engineers have seen this scenario:

• A test fails after a UI change
• The feature still works manually
• The failure is caused by a missing or outdated selector

The common causes are familiar:

• Absolute XPath tied to layout
• Index-based selectors
• Class names generated dynamically
• Locators copied without validation

None of these is “wrong” in isolation. The problem appears when they become the default approach. Over time, these shortcuts accumulate. Maintenance effort increases. CI pipelines become noisy. Teams lose confidence in automation results. Locator Labs exists to interrupt this cycle by encouraging intent-based locator design, focusing on what an element represents, not where it happens to sit in the DOM today.

What Locator Labs Actually Represents

Locator Labs can be thought of as a locator engineering practice rather than a standalone tool.

It brings together three ideas:

• Mindset: Locators are engineered, not guessed
• Workflow: Each locator follows a deliberate process
• Shared standard: The same principles apply across teams and frameworks

Just as teams agree on coding standards or design patterns, Locator Labs suggests that locators deserve the same level of attention. Importantly, Locator Labs is not tied to any single framework. Whether you use Selenium, Playwright, Cypress, WebdriverIO, or Robot Framework, the underlying locator philosophy remains the same.

Why Teams Eventually Need a Locator-Focused Approach

Early in a project, locator issues are easy to fix. A test fails, the selector is updated, and work continues. However, as automation grows, this reactive approach starts to break down.

Common long-term challenges include:

• Multiple versions of the same locator
• Inconsistent naming and structure
• Tests that fail after harmless UI refactors
• High effort required for small changes

Locator Labs helps by making locator decisions more visible and deliberate. Instead of silently copying selectors into code, teams are encouraged to inspect, evaluate, validate, and store locators with future changes in mind.

Purpose and Scope of Locator Labs

Purpose

The main goal of Locator Labs is to provide a repeatable and controlled way to design locators that are:

• Stable
• Unique
• Readable
• Reusable

Rather than reacting to failures, teams can proactively reduce fragility.

Scope

Locator Labs applies broadly, including:

• Static UI elements
• Dynamic and conditionally rendered components
• Hover-based menus and tooltips
• Large regression suites
• Cross-team automation efforts

In short, it scales with the complexity of the application and the team.

A Locator Labs-style workflow usually looks like this:

• Open the target page
• Inspect the element in DevTools
• Review available attributes
• Separate stable attributes from dynamic ones
• Choose a locator strategy
• Validate uniqueness
• Store the locator centrally

This process may take a little longer upfront, but it significantly reduces future maintenance.

Locator Lab Installation & Setup (For All Environments)

Locator Lab is a tool and is available as a browser extension, a Desktop application, and NPM Package.

Browser-Level Setup (Extension)

This is the foundation for all frameworks and languages.

Chrome / Edge

Found in Browser DevTools

Desktop Application

Download directly from LocatorLabs website.

Npm Package

No installation required; always uses the latest version

Ensure Node.js is installed on your system.

Open a terminal or command prompt.

Run the command:

npx locatorlabs

Wait for the tool to launch automatically.

Open the target web application and start capturing locators.

Setup Workflow:

• Right-click → Inspect or F12 on the testing page
• Find “Locator Labs” tab in DevTools → Elements panel
• Start inspecting elements to generate locators

Multi-Framework Support

LocatorLabs supports exporting locators and page objects across frameworks and languages:

This makes it possible to standardize locator strategy across teams using different stacks.

Where Locator Labs Fits in Automation Architecture

Locator Labs fits naturally into a layered automation design:

[Test Scenarios]
↓
[Page Objects]
↓
[Locator Definitions]
↓
[Browser DOM]

This separation keeps responsibilities clear:

• Tests describe behavior
• Page objects describe interactions
• Locators describe identity

When UI changes occur, updates stay localized instead of rippling through test suites.

Locator Strategy Hierarchy: A Simple Guideline

Locator Labs generally promotes the following priority order:

• ID
• Name
• Semantic CSS selectors
• Relative XPath
• Text or relationship-based XPath (last resort)

A helpful rule of thumb is:

*If a locator describes where something is, it’s fragile.
*If it describes what something is, it’s more stable.

This mindset alone can dramatically improve locator quality.

Features That Gently Encourage Better Locator Decisions

Rather than enforcing rules, Locator Labs-style features are designed to make good choices easier and bad ones more obvious. Below is a conversational look at how these features support everyday automation work.

Pause Mode

If you’ve ever tried to inspect a dropdown menu or tooltip, you know how annoying it can be. You move the mouse, the element disappears, and you start over again and again. Pause Mode exists for exactly this reason. By freezing page interaction temporarily it lets you inspect elements that normally vanish on hover or animation. This means you can calmly look at the DOM, identify stable attributes, and avoid rushing into fragile XPath just because the element was hard to catch.

It’s particularly helpful for:

• Menus and submenus
• Tooltips and popovers
• Animated panels

Small feature, big reduction in frustration.

Drawing and Annotation: Making Locator Decisions Visible

Locator decisions often live only in someone’s head. Annotation tools change that by allowing teams to mark elements directly on the UI.

This becomes useful when:

• Sharing context with teammates
• Reviewing automation scope
• Handing off work between manual and automation testers

Instead of long explanations, teams can point directly at the element and say, “This is what we’re automating, and this is why.” Over time, this shared visual understanding helps align locator decisions across the team.

Page Object Mode

Most teams agree on the Page Object Model in theory. In practice, locators still sneak into tests. Page Object Mode doesn’t force compliance, but it nudges teams back toward cleaner separation. By structuring locators in a page-object-friendly way, it becomes easier to keep test logic clean and UI changes isolated. The real benefit here isn’t automation speed, it’s long-term clarity.

Smart Quality Ratings

One of the trickiest things about locators is that fragile ones still work until they don’t. Smart Quality Ratings help by giving feedback on locator choices. Instead of treating all selectors equally, they highlight which ones are more likely to survive UI changes. What matters most is not the label itself, but the explanation behind it. Over time, engineers start recognizing patterns and naturally gravitate toward better locator strategies even without thinking about ratings explicitly.

Save and Copy

Copying locators, pasting them into files, and adjusting syntax might seem trivial, but it adds up. Save and Copy features reduce this repetitive work while still keeping engineers in control. When locators are exported in a consistent format, teams benefit from fewer mistakes and a more uniform structure.

Consistency, more than speed, is the real win here.

Refresh and Re-Scan

Modern UIs change constantly, sometimes even without a page reload. Refresh or Re-scan features allow teams to revalidate locators after UI updates. Instead of waiting for test failures, teams can proactively check whether selectors are still unique and meaningful. This supports a more preventive approach to maintenance.

Theme Toggle

While it doesn’t affect locator logic, theme toggling matters more than it seems. Automation work often involves long inspection sessions, and visual comfort plays a role in focus and accuracy. Sometimes, small ergonomic improvements have outsized benefits.

Generate Page Object

Writing Page Object classes by hand can be repetitive, especially for large pages. Page object generation features help by creating a structured starting point. What’s important is that this output is reviewed, not blindly accepted. Used thoughtfully, it speeds up setup while preserving good organization and readability.

Final Thoughts

Stable automation is rarely achieved through tools alone. More often, it comes from consistent, thoughtful decisions especially around how locators are designed and maintained. Locator Labs highlights the importance of treating locators as long-term assets rather than quick fixes that only work in the moment. By focusing on identity-based locators, validation, and clean separation through page objects, teams can reduce unnecessary failures and maintenance effort. This approach fits naturally into existing automation frameworks without requiring major changes or rewrites. Over time, a Locator Labs mindset helps teams move from reactive fixes to intentional design. Tests become easier to maintain, failures become easier to understand, and automation becomes more reliable. In the end, it’s less about adopting a new tool and more about building better habits that support automation at scale.

Frequently Asked Questions

Our test automation experts help teams identify fragile locators, reduce false failures, and build stable automation frameworks that scale with UI change.

Talk to an Automation Expert