There are different testing approaches available today; besides manual testing, automated testing is also possible today. There are many test automation frameworks and tools on the market—sometimes, though, manual testing is still the better option. If you want to hire software testers and are choosing between manual testing services and automated testing, you should keep these in mind.
Setting up a Manual Test Takes Less Time
Though the execution is faster with automated testing, setting up takes a lot of time. In many cases, it is faster to do a manual test. If you are starting with the project, you can create the infrastructure for an automated test.
If the project is already in full swing and has various interconnected parts, automation will take up time and resources. If it is too complex, it could even be impossible to create the proper environment for automatization.
Manual Testing Simultaneously Improves UX
Automated tests only check for values and functionality, not aesthetics. However, it isn’t enough for end-users that software is functional—it should also be easy to use. If the user interface has plenty of interactive elements, it’s easier and more affordable to go for manual testing. You can automate SDK and API portions of the interface, but you need a human touch when reviewing the visual details.
Testing Requires High-Security Access
If you have a complex project, you likely have multiple access levels for people from different departments. In manual testing, you can provide access to the systems and environments that the tester will directly handle and prevent them from accessing others.
This isn’t the case in some automated test projects. Carefully weigh whether you should use automated testing—you cannot test systems where the engineers don’t have the required access level.
Changing Many Things? Choose Manual Testing
If you are still developing your application and have not reached a stable version, don’t waste resources in creating an automated test. It is because each version update would require you to update your tests as well. Automated test outcomes are likely to be false if the app is not stable; otherwise, you will get reliable outcomes.
However, if you have the product out in the market and have a steady user base, automation could help you prevent regressions between updates. Software testing companies should help you determine the better option for your company at the moment.
Manual Tests Help Validate User Stories
Finally, you cannot validate user stories if you don’t do manual tests. You need to verify the functionality against the documentation, and only a test engineer can do this. If you add an automated test right away, you won’t be able to verify the functionality of the changes—automating could even raise defects.
Once you have the manual tests finished, the engineer can create test scenarios. Objective testing of functionality requires defects to be fixed—after that, it is possible to create automated tests.
Conclusion
Manual and automated testing have their advantages and disadvantages. While automated tests create a more efficient workflow, they aren’t always the best option to start with, especially for companies with ongoing and complex projects. It is up to the test engineer to determine the methods which suit the project and at what stage they should implement these.
Codoid is an industry-leading software testing company. Our manual testing services include UX and usability testing to DB, GUI, localization, and more. Let’s talk about your project; contact us for inquiries!
Comments(0)