by Chris Adams | Oct 15, 2024 | Accessibility Testing, Blog, Latest Post |
Finding your way online can be hard for people with disabilities. The web content accessibility guidelines, or WCAG, are here to help make web page content accessible to everyone, no matter their abilities. These guidelines offer a clear plan to create online experiences that are friendly and easy for all users. They focus on several major groups to ensure that everyone can enjoy the web.
Key Highlights
- WCAG 2.2 is the newest version of the web content accessibility guidelines. It adds nine new success criteria to make the web more inclusive.
- These guidelines help people with cognitive or learning disabilities, low vision, or those using mobile devices.
- The new criteria focus on important areas like how things look when focused on, the size of targets, dragging actions, and accessible authentication.
- WCAG 2.2 works well with assistive technologies. This helps everyone navigate and interact with ease.
- These guidelines are important for developers and content creators. They promote best practices for a better and friendlier digital space.
Overview of WCAG 2.1 and 2.2
WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 are rules made by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). They aim to make web content easy for everyone to access. WCAG 2.1 came out in 2018. This version aimed to help people with disabilities who use mobile devices.
WCAG 2.2 builds on WCAG 2.1. It gives more options to make web content accessible. This version focuses on ensuring better features for users with cognitive disabilities. It wants to make sure everyone has a better time when they use web content.
The Evolution of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
The path to WCAG began with W3C’s goal of making the internet fair for everyone. From the start, these guidelines have evolved and improved. WCAG 2.0 came out in 2008. This was an important development that created key rules for ensuring the web is accessible to everyone.
In 2018, WCAG 2.1 was launched. It introduced new success criteria. These criteria focused on the rise of mobile devices. They also took into account the needs of people with low vision and cognitive disabilities.
In 2023, WCAG 2.2 came out. This is the latest update in the work of WCAG. It focuses on improving online experiences for people with various disabilities. This update helps create a more inclusive web.
Key Objectives of WCAG 2.1 and 2.2
WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 aim to create rules that make websites easier to access, highlighting the benefits of WCAG. WCAG 2.1 made key updates for people with low vision. It improved rules for color contrast and offered more options for flexible designs. This guidance also helps make keyboard navigation better and supports people with cognitive disabilities.
WCAG 2.2 makes things better by adding new success criteria at the Level AAA and Level AA standard. It highlights the importance of accessible authentication within a set of web pages. It also suggests not using cognitive tests, such as CAPTCHAs. Instead, other better options should be used. The guidelines will also improve user interface component focus appearance, ensuring that there is sufficient color contrast between focused and unfocused states. This helps users easily see where their focus is when they use the keyboard.
The main goal of WCAG 2.2 is to improve on version 2.1. It wants to make the online world friendlier for everyone. The aim is to take away barriers. This way, all people can see, understand, find, and use the web easily.
Detailed Comparison Between WCAG 2.1 and 2.2
WCAG 2.2 is an update of WCAG 2.1, and there are important changes. Developers and content makers must learn about these changes. Understanding them can help you keep up with the new accessibility rules. This will make online experiences better for everyone.
A big change is that the “4.1.1 Parsing” success rule is no longer there. This rule was in WCAG 2.0 and 2.1. This change shows that HTML standards have improved. Now, with these new standards, parsing problems are solved automatically.
New Success Criteria in WCAG 2.2
WCAG 2.2 introduces nine new success criteria. These are designed to make web content more accessible. Some of these criteria target the needs of users with cognitive disabilities. Other criteria help make the web easier for everyone. Here is a table that lists these new criteria:
Success Criteria Description Success Criteria | Description |
2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum) | Ensures keyboard focus is at least partially visible, preventing it from being hidden behind elements like sticky headers. |
2.4.12 Focus Not Obscured (Enhanced) | Similar to the above, but requires the entire focus indicator to be visible, enhancing accessibility further. |
2.4.13 Focus Appearance | Defines a clearer standard for visible keyboard focus indicators by specifying a minimum size and contrast ratio. |
2.5.7 Dragging Movements | Requires that functionalities relying on dragging movements, like drag-and-drop, offer alternative single-pointer interactions. |
2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum) | Sets a minimum target size of 24×24 CSS pixels for interactive elements or requires sufficient spacing between smaller targets to prevent accidental clicks. |
3.2.6 Consistent Help | Mandates that if help mechanisms are used across multiple web pages within a set, they should maintain a consistent relative order for easy location. |
3.3.7 Redundant Entry | Discourages asking users to re-enter the same information within the same process, suggesting auto-population or selection of previously entered data. |
3.3.8 Accessible Authentication (Minimum) | Restricts the use of cognitive function tests (e.g., CAPTCHA) during authentication unless alternative methods or assistance are provided. |
3.3.9 Accessible Authentication (Enhanced) | Building on the above, this stricter criterion removes the exception for “object recognition” and “personal content” identification tests during the authentication process. |
Enhanced Focus on User Accessibility Needs
WCAG 2.2 is doing a great job in helping more users. It focuses on people with different needs, especially those with issues linked to cognitive function. These updates aim to make the web easier for individuals who struggle with memory, attention, or problem-solving.
One important change is the success criteria for Accessible Authentication. This change helps users log in without going through difficult tests. Now, people with cognitive disabilities can access websites and online services more easily. They will not have to face tough challenges.
WCAG 2.2 aims to provide clear and reliable help tools on websites. This is important because it helps users understand and find their way through online content. This is especially vital for people with cognitive disabilities who may need extra help to access the information.
The Impact of WCAG 2.2 on Developers and Content Creators
The launch of WCAG 2.2 is an important step toward creating a more inclusive online world. This change will affect developers and content creators. To follow these new guidelines, they need to update their technical work and content plans.
Developers need to know the new rules for user interface parts. They must make sure that keyboard focus indicators meet the updated standards, specifically ensuring that no part of the component is hidden and the area of the focus indicator is at least as large as a 2 CSS pixel thick perimeter of the unfocused component with a minimum contrast ratio. Content creators also have to learn about accessible authentication. They should find ways to cut down on repetitive entries. This is key for making a better experience for users.
Changes in Technical Requirements
WCAG 2.2 has important updates that make websites easier to use. A key change is about improving how users can use the keyboard. The new ‘Focus Appearance’ rule helps show keyboard focus better. This update is very helpful for users who cannot use a mouse.
One important change is to assist users who have trouble dragging things. The ‘Dragging Movements’ rule states that websites should provide other ways to complete tasks, like drag-and-drop. This change will make it easier for people with motor challenges to use the site.
It is important for developers to learn and use these new rules. This will help ensure their websites follow the latest WCAG standards.
Best Practices for Implementing WCAG 2.2 Guidelines
The best way to use WCAG 2.2 guidelines is to mix technical skills with user-friendly design. Here are some helpful tips to think about:
- Make Keyboard Accessibility a Priority: Your website should be simple to use with just a keyboard. Check all clickable parts, forms, and functions by using only a keyboard.
- Provide Clear and Consistent Visual Cues: Use strong color differences for text and backgrounds. Make sure the focus indicator is the right size and color according to WCAG 2.2 rules.
- Test with Assistive Technologies: Use screen readers and other tools. This helps you view your website like users with disabilities do. This view can reveal some accessibility issues.
- Give Alternative Content Formats: Add captions for videos, transcripts for audio, and text descriptions for images. This helps users who can’t access some formats to still get the content.
- Create Testable Success Criteria: Design your website to be easy to test. The new success criteria should be easy to check for rules. You can use automated testing tools, do manual tests, or a mix of both.
Legal and Compliance Aspects of WCAG 2.2
WCAG is not a law. However, it helps shape laws for making websites accessible in many places. If you do not follow these rules, you might run into legal issues. This can include lawsuits and fines.
It is important to know the laws where you live. You also need to keep your website updated to follow the latest WCAG guidelines. This is not just a good practice but also a legal need for many organizations.
Understanding the ADA and Section 508 in the Context of WCAG 2.2
In the United States, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 508 set important rules for making digital content easy for everyone to use. They do not directly require following WCAG guidelines. Still, many people use these guidelines to reach their accessibility goals.
Section 508 is a law that applies to federal agencies and any program that receives federal funds. This law states that electronic and information technology should be easy for people with disabilities to use. Courts often see the ADA as covering websites and mobile apps now. This is especially true for businesses that serve the public.
Organizations should focus on digital accessibility because of the current legal landscape. They need to follow the newest WCAG guidelines, including the recent rules from WCAG 2.2.
Global Accessibility Laws and WCAG Compliance
WCAG is now seen as the most important global standard for web accessibility. It is the base for accessibility laws in many countries, including guidelines for user agent interactions. In Europe, the European Accessibility Act (EAA) lists the rules to make different products and services accessible. This includes websites and mobile apps. The EAA relies a lot on the most recent version of WCAG 2.1.
The EAA does not require WCAG 2.2 right now. However, it aims to follow similar accessibility standards. This means that changes are expected. These changes will include the latest guidelines.
The use of WCAG in laws shows that digital accessibility is now a key right. No matter what the laws say, organizations must focus on WCAG conformance. This practice improves the online experience for all users.
Conclusion
In conclusion, web developers and content creators should understand the differences between WCAG 2.1 and 2.2. WCAG 2.2 includes new success criteria that focus more on what users need. This change impacts technical requirements and best practices. It is required by law to follow WCAG guidelines. Doing this helps include all users. Keep up with the changing accessibility standards. By doing so, you can create a more welcoming online space. If you need help with WCAG 2.2 guidelines, look for resources that can support your compliance journey.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What are the major differences between WCAG 2.1 and 2.2?
WCAG 2.2 has nine new success criteria that are different from WCAG 2.1. It focuses on important parts like focus visibility, accessible authentication, and target size. In short, WCAG 2.2 builds on the current rules we have. It also adds new rules to improve accessibility.
- How does WCAG 2.2 affect existing websites?
Existing websites should check out the new criteria from WCAG 2.2 and try to follow them. Although it is not required right now, using these guidelines will help users with disabilities. This will make the website more welcoming and easy to use for everyone.
- Are there new accessibility tests for WCAG 2.2 compliance?
Yes, new tests for accessibility are coming out. They will check if websites meet the success criteria of WCAG 2.2. These tests focus on several things. This includes focus appearance, target size, and contrast ratio, among other factors.
by Chris Adams | Oct 9, 2024 | Accessibility Testing, Blog, Latest Post |
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 is an important new version from the Web Accessibility Initiative. It aims to make the web easier for everyone to use. This includes better access to important status messages. This update introduces additional success criteria that improve on those in WCAG 2.0. WCAG 2.1 mainly focuses on how people with disabilities use technology. It pays close attention to assistive technologies and the growth of mobile devices. It also highlights key shortcuts and character key shortcuts to help users navigate web content better.
Key Highlights
- WCAG 2.1 adds 17 new success criteria. This makes websites easier for more people to use.
- The update is meant to help individuals with disabilities who use the internet.
- A major focus of WCAG 2.1 is mobile accessibility. It addresses the rise in mobile device use.
- This version improves experiences for those with low vision and users of screen readers.
- Developers now have new tools and resources. These will help them shift from WCAG 2.0 to 2.1 easily.
Understanding WCAG: An Overview
Web content accessibility means that everyone, including people with disabilities, can easily access and use online content. This includes various ways to interact with it, called input modalities, ensuring the use of input modalities is diverse and effective. This idea is a key part of WCAG. WCAG stands for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, created by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). When developers stick to these rules, they help build a digital environment where everyone can find and use information easily. This means that everyone feels included, no matter their physical or mental abilities.
WCAG is important for everyone, not just people with disabilities. A website that is well-designed and easy to access offers a better experience for all users. When web developers follow WCAG, they help make the web a nicer place for everyone.
The Evolution from WCAG 2.0 to 2.1
The move from WCAG 2.0 to WCAG 2.1 is important for making the world wide web easier for everyone. WCAG 2.1 adds more success criteria. It includes new criteria like motion actuation, which helps prevent accidental actuation. This update does not throw out what we already have. It improves and adds to the current rules. This change helps web pages meet the changing needs of users with disabilities.
The new success criteria highlight different challenges and chances in digital access. There are many mobile devices and different user needs. WCAG 2.1 puts more attention on mobile access. It also includes help for visual, auditory, and cognitive disabilities.
These changes aim to make the online experience better for everyone. They recognize the different ways people connect to the digital world. By addressing specific issues and using new assistive technologies, WCAG 2.1 helps create a fair and easy-to-use web for all.
Key Principles of Web Accessibility
Accessibility is about helping all people. This includes those with different abilities. It helps them to see, understand, and use web content. When developers work on web content accessibility, they want to make it simple for all kinds of needs and choices.
This effort is about finding new ways to share information. This includes giving text descriptions for pictures, adding captions to videos, and providing keyboard navigation options. Many people with disabilities use assistive technologies. These features help them have a better experience online.
When developers think about accessibility, they build websites for many people. This creates a friendly space for all users. By prioritizing accessibility in their work, they help create a more inclusive internet.
Major Enhancements in WCAG 2.1
WCAG 2.1 is an update that builds on the previous version. It makes important changes to help many users. These updates consider how technology has improved and how we depend on the internet. The aim is to make it easy for everyone to access web development.
A big change is happening in how people use their phones. More people are going online with their phones. Because of this, WCAG 2.1 introduces new rules. These rules help ensure that websites are shaped and look good on any screen size and position.
New Guidelines for Mobile Accessibility
WCAG 2.1 focuses on how many people are now using mobile devices and changes in web accessibility because of this. Its goal is to make sure there is no loss of information or parts of the content. The new guidelines take into account the unique challenges faced by users with disabilities when they use mobile devices, ensuring that a specific display orientation is not essential. For those with visual impairments, WCAG 2.1 emphasizes the need for a responsive design that uses CSS pixels. This means that the content should fit well on various screen sizes and resolutions.
The guidelines are about motor impairments. These impairments can make it hard for users to touch screens properly. WCAG 2.1 advises that interactive parts should have larger touch areas. This change helps users with motor impairments to use them without mistakes.
WCAG 2.1 uses mobile-focused rules to help developers create websites and apps for the many people who use mobile devices. These updates ensure that everyone has a better and more inclusive online experience.
Improvements in Visual and Hearing Accessibility
The look of web content is very important for people who need better access. WCAG 2.1 brings new useful features for users with low vision and for those who use various human languages. This is especially true for those who have low contrast sensitivity. The guidelines point out the importance of having a good contrast ratio between text and background colors. These major changes make text style properties easier to read. This all helps people read and understand content, no matter what their vision is.
WCAG 2.1 has improved rules for non-text content. It shows how important it is to use alternative text for images and graphics. This allows screen readers to share important visual details with people who are blind or have low vision.
The need for screen reader support goes beyond just adding alternative text. WCAG 2.1 advises web developers to use simple markup, ARIA attributes, and more tools. These practices help users understand the design of the website. They also assist in navigating the site and using its interactive features with screen readers.
Detailed Comparison between WCAG 2.0 and 2.1
Both WCAG 2.0 and 2.1 work to make the web better for all users. It’s key to know the differences between them to create websites and apps that everyone can use. The biggest difference is that WCAG 2.1 has new success criteria. These new success criteria focus on the needs of today’s technology and its users.
The new guidelines have the same rules as WCAG 2.0. They make the rules better. They also help more people access our digital world as it evolves. The next section highlights the key differences between these two versions. It shows how moving to WCAG 2.1 can truly make a difference.
Enhanced Criteria for Text and Images
Text and images are important for how people use a website. WCAG 2.1 introduces new rules to make these areas better. It knows that good formatting and alternative text descriptions matter a lot. This helps people with disabilities in understanding and using web content easily.
WCAG 2.1 helps with text spacing. It allows users to change how text appears to fit their needs. You can change the line spacing, add space after paragraphs, and adjust letter and word spacing.
WCAG 2.1 knows there are many images of text. It gives rules to make these images easier to access. Developers should use text alternatives whenever possible. This means they need to provide text versions of the images. This way, screen readers can read the text to users. It helps users who cannot see the image get the same information.
Feature | WCAG 2.0 | WCAG 2.1 |
Text Spacing | Addressed, but WCAG 2.1 provides more specific guidance | Encourages flexibility, allowing users to adjust spacing without loss of content or functionality |
Images of Text | Use of text alternatives encouraged | Reiterates the importance of providing text alternatives for images of text for accessibility |
Advanced Navigation Accessibility Features
Navigation can be hard for people with disabilities. WCAG 2.1 has new tools to help users use keyboards better. This change helps those who have difficulty using a mouse or trackpad.
A key part of this is making keyboard focus easy to see. WCAG 2.1 says that we should make keyboard focus easy to notice. This helps people know where they are on the page.
For people who use single pointer tools, like a head pointer or mouth stick, WCAG 2.1 has guidelines for single pointer gestures. These guidelines help make sure that functions using multi-touch gestures, such as pinch-to-zoom, can also work in different ways. If you are using voice recognition software or a user agent, WCAG 2.1 shows the importance of clear form input data and the visual presentation of the additional content. It needs easy labels, clear instructions, and helpful error messages. This way, forms will be accessible and simple to use for people with cognitive disabilities.
Implementing WCAG 2.1 for Web Developers
Making changes to follow WCAG 2.1 can feel tough, but a good plan can help. Developers should view these guidelines as important rules for good web design. They also need to consider how to make their project accessible from the start.
Many resources can help developers meet WCAG 2.1 standards. Using these tools can make work easier. They assist developers in creating websites that everyone can use.
Tools and Resources for Compliance
To make sure web pages follow the WCAG 2.1 rules, you need the right tools, resources, and practices. Automated testing tools are very important. They help developers find accessibility problems early during development. These tools check web pages based on WCAG rules and give reports that point out areas that need improvement.
But using only automated testing is not enough. Manual testing remains very important. It helps find tricky accessibility issues. It also checks how users feel about the site. Including users with disabilities in the testing is crucial. This allows developers to receive helpful feedback. They can also make sure the solutions work well in real life.
Developers can use accessibility libraries and frameworks to make their work easier. These tools provide simple and accessible user interface components. They show what the purpose of user interface components is. This can help save time and lower the chance of mistakes. By adding accessibility from the start and using the right markup languages, developers can make sure their web pages and applications follow WCAG 2.1 standards.
Best Practices for Smooth Transition
Transitioning to WCAG 2.1 needs careful planning. This planning helps ensure users have a good experience and stops new accessibility issues from happening. Begin by looking at your current code to find problems related to the new rules. Do a thorough check to see what updates you need to make, especially in areas affected by the new guidelines.
- Ensure that new styles or features do not lead to any loss of content or function for users of assistive technologies.
- Test everything across different devices and browsers.
- Also, check it with assistive technologies.
- This will help ensure that all parts work well together.
- It will also help prevent any unexpected problems.
Preventing data loss is very important during this change. You need to create strong systems to manage errors. It is also key to give clear steps to users on how to recover data if something goes wrong. Following these best practices can make it easier for developers to switch to WCAG 2.1. This can reduce problems for users and keep the digital space fair and open for everyone.
Conclusion
In summary, it is important to know the differences between WCAG 2.0 and 2.1. This knowledge helps ensure websites follow accessibility rules. The change from 2.0 to 2.1 brings important updates in design, especially useful for mobile users and individuals with vision challenges. Using WCAG 2.1 provides clearer guidelines for text, images, and navigation, resulting in a more accessible internet for everyone. Web developers need to understand these new rules and should use available tools and best practices to easily follow WCAG 2.1. This change will improve the experience for people with disabilities. Additionally, Codoid has experienced testers familiar with accessibility testing, who can assist in ensuring that websites comply with these updated guidelines.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What are the main differences between WCAG 2.0 and 2.1?
WCAG 2.1 is an upgrade from WCAG 2.0. It includes 17 new success criteria. These changes focus on helping people with low vision. They also assist users with cognitive disabilities. Plus, there is better visual presentation for an improved experience.
- Why was WCAG 2.1 introduced?
WCAG 2.1 was created to keep up with new technology and how people use it. More people are using mobile devices today. We now understand cognitive disabilities better. Because of this, we had to add new content and rules. This helps everyone interact more easily.
- How can organizations ensure compliance with WCAG 2.1?
To meet WCAG 2.1 standards, you need a good plan. First, learn about the new Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Next, use the tools and resources that are available. Testing is important, so make sure to test everything well. Also, listen to user feedback. This will help improve web content accessibility for everyone.
by Anika Chakraborty | Nov 3, 2022 | Accessibility Testing, Blog |
As mobile phones are the most commonly used gadget in the global space, it is highly important to ensure that it is accessible to everyone. According to a CDC estimate, one in four adult Americans has some form of disability. In today’s modern age where smartphones and mobile apps are an essential part of daily life for many, mobile app accessibility testing has definitely become the need of the hour. As a leading accessibility testing company, we have years of experience in testing both Android & iOS apps for their accessibility. With that experience, we have created this definitive Mobile App Accessibility Testing Checklist that will ensure your mobile apps are accessible.
Mobile App Accessibility Testing Checklist
There are so many aspects of a mobile application that has to be tested to ensure it is accessible to people with disabilities. At its core, we can use the POUR principle to check if the mobile app and its features are
- Perceivable: Check if information and user interface elements are presented in a way that users can perceive them with ease.
- Operable: Make sure the mobile app’s navigation is used so that it enables easy user interaction.
- Understandable: Ensure that the information and user interface functionality is understandable.
- Robust: Test if the mobile app’s features & functionalities are robust so that they can be reliably interpreted by a wide range of user agents, including users using assistive technology such as screen readers.
But the problem with such a mobile app accessibility testing checklist is that it does not cover the intricate actions that have to be done to ensure your mobile app is accessible. That is why we have created a categorized mobile app accessibility testing checklist that will provide you with definitive actions you’ll need to do in an organized manner.
Categorized Mobile App Accessibility Testing Checklist
By keeping POUR at the core, we have created this categorized mobile app accessibility testing checklist to make it easy for you to understand and navigate through our blog.
- User Interaction
- Navigation
- Notifications
- Form Labels & Validation
- Toggle Button
- Tables & Accordion
- Text & Color Contrast
- Images
- Audio & Video
- Animation & Motion
1. User Interaction
Accidental touches in any mobile app can be annoying to any user. But what could be just annoying to regular users can have serious impacts when used by people with disabilities. Such issues can worsen the user experience for all users in general. One such way to improve the user experience is by following this Mobile App Accessibility Testing Checklist that will ensure users have no issues with user interaction.
- Check if the click or touch target size is large enough for the user to touch their intended target without any difficulties. Also, make sure that the touch targets do not overlap.
- Even if there are any compact touch targets, ensure they are not placed adjacent to each other to avoid accidental touches.
- If multiple active elements have the same target, make sure those elements are grouped into a one-touch target.
- Ensure that the application doesn’t rely on kinetic motion (detected by the accelerometer) alone for inputs.
- Verify if the motion-sensitive features can be disabled by the users.
- Make sure the mobile application is not completely or too dependent on voice control or on gestures as it could limit usability in some cases.
- Check if the autocomplete suggestions are announced to the users when they appear and also validate if they are operable.
2. Navigation
Now that we have looked at the user interaction, let’s cover the navigational aspects in our Mobile App Accessibility Testing Checklist as it is a very common issue faced by many.
- Ensure that the mobile app screens have meaningful titles and tabs that convey their role, their current state, and their order in the total number of tabs to the screen reader.
- Verify if the buttons accurately convey to users their accessible name, role, value, and state through the respective screen reader.
- Check if a button or an active image used as a button conveys their correct trait or role.
- Make sure the role and purpose of a hyperlink are clearly specified in the anchor text as generic texts like ‘Click Here’ will confuse a user using TalkBack/VoiceOver.
- Check if the progress bars convey their visible name, role, and current value to TalkBack/ VoiceOver users with a descriptive and unique accessibility label.
- Verify if the slider controls and switch controls have a visible label that is programmatically associated using the accessibility label property.
- Verify if the button that opens the menu has a clear and descriptive title or must have an accessibility label that accurately conveys its purpose.
- Test if users using screenreaders are able to dismiss the menu and when they do so; check if the focus returns to the triggering button correctly.
3. Notifications
The most important function of a mobile app notification is to grab the attention of the device user. But how can we make these notifications accessible for people with various disabilities? We can ensure these notifications are designed with actual mechanisms including visual, auditory, and vibration cues. Here are the checkpoints you’ll have to follow to achieve that.
- Test whether the dynamic content changes are notified to Talkback/ VoiceOver users through spoken accessibility announcements or focus management.
- Ensure that the user login session doesn’t timeout without providing any accessible timeout warning or a session extension method.
- Verify whether all alerts include a title and a description and that are announced through Talkback/VoiceOver or if they grab the user’s attention.
- Validate if the Modal dialogs capture the focus of the screen reader and trap the keyboard. Make sure the presented dialogs are given focus until dismissed by the user.
4. Form Labels & Validation
Form labels and Validation are especially important in making a mobile app accessible as it ensures the users are able to easily provide their input when needed. They are generally read by a screen reader and the form fields also receive focus whenever it requires user inputs. So next up in our mobile app accessibility testing checklist, we’ll be covering what aspects you’ll have to check to ensure disabled users can use their assistive technologies to full effect.
- Ensure that the native date picker controls which are exclusive to android are used over plain text inputs or custom date picker controls.
-
- Test if controls using UIPickerView which is exclusive to iOS are programmatically connected with their visible label.
- If there are any inputs that require a star rating or any rating in general, ensure they have accessible names that be conveyed to the end user.
- Ensure that the label text is visible to the end-users at all times and they are programmatically associated with their corresponding control elements.
- Check whether the groups of related inputs convey their group legend text to the TalkBack/VoiceOver users.
- Validate if the radio buttons convey their individual label, group legend, and checked state to the end-users.
- Check if the Select dropdown controls have an associated visible text label.
- Ensure that the users receive effective, understandable, and properly labeled text-based notifications for form validation signals and errors.
5. Text & Color Contrast
Sometimes the text color, contrast, and size can make it hard for people with visual impairments to read. So in our mobile app accessibility testing checklist, we’ve listed all the major points you’ll need to cover in this regard.
- Test if sections of content whose language is different from the mobile app’s default language are programmatically identified and marked in a way that allows assistive technology to find them.
- If any information is conveyed through color or a change in color, ensure it is accompanied by a programmatically-discernible text alternative.
- Check if the contrast ratio for small text is at least 4.5 to 1 with the background and if the contrast ratio of large text is at least 3 to 1 with the background.
- When text or images are used to replace color to convey information, make sure it correctly conveys the same information.
6. Toggle Button
Understanding the state of toggle buttons can be very tricky for people with disabilities. Since toggle buttons are commonly used in numerous mobile apps you’ll have to follow the below-mentioned actions.
- Ensure the state of the toggle button is conveyed to the end user.
- Make sure that the toggle button conveys an accessible name with programmatically associated and visible labels that convey their state.
- Check if the image toggle buttons have descriptive and accurate alternative text provided in the accessibility label.
7. Tables & Accordion
Though we may not see many tables and accordions, few mobile apps might actually use them or different forms of them in a feature. Without the right tests, understanding tables can truly become a huge challenge, especially when using assistive technologies such as screen readers. So let’s look at the checkpoints you’ll need in our mobile app accessibility testing checklist.
- Test if the screen reader is able to read the accessible names of the accordion components.
- Make sure the screen reader announces if the component is in the expanded or collapsed state.
- Check if the data in the tables are in a logical reading order and if the screen reader is announcing the correct row and column header text to the users.
- Verify if the sorted state of a sortable table column header is conveyed to the users.
8. Images
Thanks to fast internet speeds on mobile data, almost every mobile app today uses images. So images are the next focus area in our mobile app accessibility testing checklist where we tell you how you can use alt text correctly.
- Test if images that convey valuable information have an accessibility label or appropriate alternative text that describes the image or presents the same information as the image.
- But if there are any decorative or redundant images in the mobile app, make sure that such images don’t have any alternative text equivalents as they should be hidden from the screen readers.
- Make sure images of text are not used as they should not be used if the same output can be achieved using real text. Logos with the company name are examples of when images can replace text.
- Test if the image button controls have a proper content description.
- If your mobile app uses custom emojis, check if they have appropriate alternative text.
9. Audio & Video
Few mobile apps might use audio & videos or few apps might be used exclusively to stream video or audio over the internet or playback the files in the internal storage system. So based on the use case, make sure to follow the specified actions to ensure they are accessible.
- Test if all the pre-recorded multimedia content (Videos & Audio) and narration events that contain dialog and/or narration must be accompanied by synchronized captions.
- Likewise, check if videos have audio descriptions or separate audio-described versions for users who have vision disabilities.
- Make sure all prerecorded videos and audio used in the mobile app have text transcripts.
- Verify if the SeekBar sliders have TextView labels.
- If the mobile app uses any sound effect used to convey the success or failure of a process, make sure there are alternative ways to convey the same information.
10. Animations and Motion
Every mobile application will have a certain number of animations and motions to make it visually appealing to its users. But these can also be a challenge for users with seizures as sudden & continuous flashes of light might be a trigger. Here are some of the ways you can achieve your goal.
- If there is a Carousel of multimedia content, check if there is a way to stop the Carousel’s movement.
- Validate if the users are able to disable any non-essential motion-sensitive visual effects.
- Make sure that the content doesn’t flash more than three times a second and that it doesn’t violate the general flash thresholds as it could affect people with seizures.
- Ensure that the progress spinners or other similar loading effects have proper alternative text to ensure the information is conveyed.
- Likewise, test if they immediately receive focus so that the screen reader can announce their accessible name to the users.
Conclusion
We hope this Mobile App accessibility testing checklist walked you through the key components, such as general objectives, necessary testing procedures, suggested testing, and unique considerations to build a mobile app with all the necessary accessibility features. Apart from enabling the mobile app to be accessible to people with disabilities, such type of testing will also enhance the overall user experience of regular users.
Another aspect that makes it a win-win situation is that you can steer clear of any legal trouble by ensuring your mobile app is accessible. Based on the location you operate your mobile app or website, there are legal grounds for people to sue you if the products are inaccessible. Over the years we have delivered top-notch accessibility testing services for testing websites, e-learning platforms, mobile apps, and so on for our customers who have truly benefited from creating accessible products and services.
by Arthur Williams | Sep 15, 2022 | Accessibility Testing, Blog |
Wrong clicks and incorrect touches can be annoying to any user. But what could be just annoying to regular users can have serious impacts when used by people with disabilities as such issues could render the product unusable. That is why WCAG introduced the Success Criterion 2.5.2 for Pointer Cancellation in WCAG 2.1. Understanding Success Criterion 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation is very important as it has to be fulfilled to achieve Level A compliance. So in this blog, we will be exploring the different conditions that have to be satisfied and get to know the exceptions by using examples. But before that, let’s take a deeper look at why Pointer Cancellation is very important for people with disabilities.
UNDERSTANDING SUCCESS CRITERION 2.5.2 POINTER CANCELLATION
The 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation success criterion belongs to the 2.5 guidelines of WCAG 2.1 that deals with input modalities for making it easier for people with disabilities to use more input methods other than the keyboard. Visually challenged people might use a braille keyboard and be unable to use a mouse or touch input devices. But people with other disabilities such as hearing loss or even color blindness will be able to use a mouse or provide touch inputs as well. But the primary focus of the 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation success criterion is to help people with motor-based impairments and cognitive disabilities as they are prone to making more mistakes.
Pointer Cancellation can be compared to the undo button that is present in most applications. For example, if we accidentally delete all the selected text in Microsoft Word or Google Docs, we would just hit the undo button and fix the issue. But it is not that simple when it comes to using the web as people might be taking an important online test or making a purchase and so on. So WCAG has given 3 options for us to choose from as the 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation success criteria will be satisfied even if one of the 3 conditions is met.
The 3 Conditions in 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation
Before we move forward in our effort to understand the 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation success criterion, we’ll have to know what Up and Down events are. If we were to take the mouse as an example, the down event is the process of pressing the button down, and the up event is the process of releasing the pressed button. The same applies to touch-enabled devices as well where touching a part of the screen is the down-event and releasing your hand is the up-event.
For example, let’s say there is a button to mute the audio output. You can observe in the illustration that the audio will not be muted when the button is pressed down (Down-Event) and that the functionality will be carried out when the button is released (Up-Event).
No-Down-event
One of the best ways to achieve pointer cancellation is by ensuring that the function is not carried out with the down-event completion alone. So if you are holding the mouse button down, the action should be completed only when you let it go (When the up-event happens). By doing so, there will be an option to abort or even reverse the click when the up-event happens.
The Exception
But there are a few exceptions when it comes to the 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation success criterion as not all functionalities can be developed in a way that prevents a no-down-event. Let’s take an example of a piano application where a key press or touch input will mimic the action of the keys of a piano getting pressed. Such a scenario can be an exception as there might be a need for two or more keys to be pressed simultaneously to produce a particular sound. In addition to that, the duration of the key press will also determine how long the sound will be actively produced.
Up-event abort or Undo
So if ensuring that the down press does not affect functionality until the key is released, the next step would be to define a target area around the click. By doing so, we can enable users to move out of the target area if they have clicked incorrectly and then perform the up-event to either abort the operation or undo it.
Example
The drag and drop feature is a very great example as there will be a target area from where the file is being dragged to where it is being dropped and if at all the user has dragged the wrong file, then they can just undo their action by dropping the item outside the target area. Even if it is not a drag-and-drop feature, the users must be able to just move away from the target area before performing the up-event to abort the down-event.
Up Reversal
This is also similar to the up-event abort or undo function we have seen thus far in terms of the 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation success criterion. But it serves a different purpose instead of aborting or undoing an action. It can be used for functions that use press and hold actions. So it will only hold the effect of a down-event until the up-event is performed.
Example:
Activating or viewing a pop-up is a great example of a press-and-hold action. If a user clicks on a pop-up or a pop-up video the down-event will ensure that the pop-up stays open or active until the up-event is performed. It will revert back to the state it was in before the down-event.
A Quick Tip
Even if we follow such conditions, users are prone to make mistakes by performing both the down and up events quickly unaware that they have made a mistake. So if you are working on pages that don’t support the back button such as payment gateways, online examination submissions, and so on, it is always better to use a confirmation pop-up.
Example:
If we take an online examination itself as an example, the submit button shouldn’t work on a single click as an incorrect click might end the exam for the participants abruptly. So a pop-up that confirms if the user is ready to submit their answers and end the examination should be mandatory to ensure incorrect outcomes.
Conclusion
We hope you have clearly understood Success Criterion 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellation by now and will be able to implement your gained knowledge while testing a product. As one of the leading accessibility testing services providers in the industry, we are experts when it comes to testing in accordance with WCAG’s success criteria. We will continue to share more informative content and recommend you subscribe to our newsletter to keep yourself updated on software testing.
by Anika Chakraborty | Jun 16, 2022 | Accessibility Testing, Blog |
If you have made some significant investments in your business and haven’t already begun working on your website accessibility, these tax breaks may just be what you need right now. We all would be aware of the tax credits that help us with the costs incurred towards aiding accessibility like hiring a sign language interpreter for an event or a wheelchair ramp, etc. Likewise, there is a tax credit in the United States for having an accessible website as well. So in this blog, we will be seeing how you can avail the website accessibility tax credit and discuss the various additional advantages you can benefit from by having an accessible website. Apart from the many advantages, creating a barrier-free digital experience without any website accessibility challenges for all the people with disabilities is a much-appreciated initiative.
Website Accessibility Tax Credit
According to an article cited by Forbes, 71% of website users with disabilities will leave the site immediately if the site is not accessible and search for one that is more user-friendly. The major issue here is that it will shoot the bounce rate up and harm your organic rankings. So even after doing all the hard work to reach a valid user, you will miss out on reaping the benefits. So, it is very clear that having an accessible website has lots of benefits and one of them is the tax credit.
The website accessibility tax credit is primarily intended to encourage businesses to make their websites accessible by compensating the costs incurred in doing so. Under the IRS Code Section 44, Disabled Access Credit, companies who make changes to make their business accessible to people with disabilities are eligible for a $5,000 tax credit. Since your website is also seen as a part of your business, having an accessible website will make you eligible for the web accessibility tax credit.
How to Apply for the Website Accessibility Tax Credit
- To be eligible for the website accessibility tax credit, your company must have annual revenues of less than $1 million and have less than 30 full-time workers.
- If eligible, the businesses may apply for the tax credit via the IRS 8826 form.
- A tax of 50% is eligible for businesses whose list of eligible expenditures exceeds $250 but does not exceed $10,250 for a taxable year.
Note: These website accessibility tax credits are different from the tax deductions. They will be applied after the tax is determined, and the credit will be removed directly from the tax owed.
Additional Benefits of Website Accessibility
While website accessibility is a vital aim for encouraging more people to utilize the internet, it also has a direct influence on a company’s digital success. So let’s explore the additional benefits apart from the website accessibility tax credit that an accessible website can offer.
Enhanced Usability
The purpose of accessibility is to ensure access to information for individuals with disabilities and enable them to use the web services like everyone. But it also increases the usability of your website for all users and makes it easier for mobile phone users & old age users to view your content. Since the number of mobile phone users on the internet is on the rise, this is a key benefit that you shouldn’t miss out on. Although it is not possible to design a website that’s accessible to all, a few common modifications can go a long way in reaching a wider audience.
SEO Booster
Accessibility enablers like a proper heading structure, alt text, closed captions, and video transcripts are also effective SEO boosters that can help in the organic reach and ranking of your website and its content. Apart from that, the decrease in bounce rate that we discussed earlier will also improve the SEO health of your website.
Building a Positive PR
Positive PR can go a long way in helping boost your visibility. The value of your brand is impacted by the values and beliefs you stand for. Since web accessibility is universally agreed upon to be a necessity, projecting your brand’s efforts in ensuring that the disabled people’s right to information is fulfilled will definitely be a boom.
Higher Quality Code
Developing a site that is accessible is comparatively easier than making a site accessible due to various reasons. So if you are creating a website with the intent of making it accessible, you will observe that the code is cleaner and of higher quality. So the end result will be the reduction of bugs, better performance, and overall better usability.
But what if your Website isn’t Accessible?
Apart from helping a business attain digital visibility, success, and the website accessibility tax credit, accessible websites also protect it from legal issues. The number of website accessibility lawsuits is rapidly increasing with high-profile companies such as Netflix and Dominos facing such litigations. The rise of awareness with regards to website accessibility could be a major contributor to such litigations. So companies looking to stay away from any kind of discrimination accusations and legal actions should seek to incorporate online accessibility standards such as the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). They can also receive a Letter of Reasonable Accessibility attesting to the fact that their website has been audited and reasonable modifications have been made to help the individuals with disabilities.
Website Accessibility Challenges
Though you can perform basic checks from your end, it is always recommended to hand it over to the experts by approaching a web accessibility testing company as there are numerous challenges. It will also not be enough to make your site comply with the WCAG conformance levels and help you stay safe from legal actions. Even the smallest of accessibility issues can become obstacles that make it difficult or even impossible for impaired users to access, navigate, or interact with your website’s content. So here’s a list of the most common web accessibility challenges one can face.
- The size and nature of the website are factors as it will be hard to implement accessibility in large and dynamic websites.
- The scope for automation in accessibility testing is very minimal and so it would require a lot of manual effort.
- The testers performing the accessibility testing should be well-versed with all the WCAG standards to be effective.
- Performing accessibility testing is also very different from the other types of software testing because of the guidelines we have to adhere to. So there is a lack of good accessibility testers who can look past the guidelines and test with the user experience of the people with disabilities in mind.
- Not all disabilities are covered under WCAG or have the required aids to overcome the limitations.
- Despite the presence of WCAG, there are different accessibility laws around the world and you would have to comply with those as well.
Conclusion
The most obvious benefit of having an accessible website is that it helps people with disabilities enjoy the digital experience just like everyone else. But web accessibility doesn’t limit itself to just that, it also serves as a source for the $5,000 website accessibility tax credit, improves the SEO, enhances the overall usability, and so on. If you’re worried about how you’ll be able to attain the required compliance on your own, you could always reach out to an established web accessibility testing services provider such as us to attain the required accessibility compliance without having to burn a hole in your pocket. Our team of experienced accessibility testers here at Codoid is ready to help. We are passionate about making your website as accessible as possible to all users!
by Arthur Williams | Apr 29, 2022 | Accessibility Testing, Blog, Top Picks |
As of 2022, the internet has a whopping 4.95 billion users on a global level (i.e) 62.5% of the entire global population is on the internet. There are various reasons for us to believe that the internet is one of the best innovations of this century as it has reshaped the course of our lives by providing us with access to information at our fingertips. But the question to be asked here is if this access is universal to all of us. Truth be told, no. There are about 1 Billion people with at least one form of disability. Web accessibility is the way to ensure that the basic right to information is fulfilled for the 1 billion people, and accessibility testing is the key to ensuring it.
Accessibility testing is definitely very different from regular testing types. Its unique nature might even instill fear in various testers to even try to learn about accessibility testing. Being a leading web-accessibility testing service provider, we have years of experience in this domain. Our dedicated team of testers has mastered the accessibility testing process to not only comply with the various guidelines but to also ensure access and a great user experience for people with disabilities. So in this blog, we will be extensively covering the concepts you will need to know to perform accessibility testing, how web accessibility is measured, the various steps involved in accessibility testing, and much more. Before we head to all that, let’s first clear the air from any and all misconceptions by debunking the myths surrounding accessibility testing.
Debunking the Popular Accessibility Myths
The most common accessibility myth is that web accessibility testing is expensive, time-consuming, hard to implement, and that it is not necessary as only a few people suffer from disabilities. But the reality is very different from these assumptions. So let’s take a look at other such accessibility myths and debunk them.
Accessibility is beneficial only to a very few people
15% of the entire world population suffers from at least one form of disability. So assuming that millions of people need not access your website or app is definitely not a logical decision even when thinking from a business perspective.
Accessibility is time-consuming & hard to implement
Talking about the business perspective, we can say without any doubt that accessibility testing is not time-consuming or hard to implement. If you have a capable accessibility testing team such as us, you will be able to ensure that your product can reach and be used by a wider audience.
Accessibility makes sites ugly
This is a factor that started out to be a real challenge during the early days of the internet. It is now an accessibility myth as many of the limitations of the past are no longer a problem now. So this should no longer be an excuse to have your site inaccessible as no WCAG guideline prevents us from using multimedia options such as images and videos. Moreover, there are different compliance levels that one can target to achieve. So attaining the least level of compliance will at least ensure most users get access to your content.
Accessibility is only optional
Technically accessibility is not optional for a website or app in different parts of the world. Since we primarily build our products to work on a global scale, it will be highly recommended to keep your product accessible so you can stay out of legal trouble.
Accessibility provides no other added value
This accessibility myth is so far away from reality as the efforts we take to make the site accessible can greatly enhance the overall user experience for all users and even improve your SEO performance as using descriptive anchor text, alt text, and titles make it easier for Google to crawl your site.
Accessibility Laws Around the World
S. No | COUNTRY / REGION | LAW NAME | YEAR OF IMPLEMENTATION | SCOPE | WCAG VERSION |
1 | AUSTRALIA | Disability Discrimination Act 1992 | 1992 | Public Sector, Private Sector | WCAG 2.0 |
2 | CANADA | Canadian Human Rights Act | 1985 | Public Sector, Private Sector | WCAG 2.0 |
3 | CHINA | Law On The Protection Of Persons With Disabilities 1990 | 2008 | Public Sector, Private Sector | None |
4 | DENMARK | Agreement On The Use Of Open Standards For Software In The Public Sector, October 2007 (Danish) | 2007 | Public Sector | WCAG 2.0 |
5 | EUROPEAN | Web And Mobile Accessibility Directive | 2016 | Public Sector | WCAG 2.0 |
6 | FINLAND | Act On Electronic Services And Communication In The Public Sector | 2003 | Government | None |
7 | FRANCE | ” Law N° 2005-102 Of February 11, 2005 For Equal Rights And Opportunities, Participation And Citizenship Of People With Disabilities (French)” | 2005 | Public Sector | None |
8 | GERMANY | Act On Equal Opportunities For Persons With Disabilities (Disability Equality Act – BGG) (German | 2002 | Public Sector, Private Sector | None |
9 | HONG KONG(HKSAR) | Guidelines On Dissemination Of Information Through Government Websites | 1999 | Government | WCAG 2.0 |
10 | INDIA | Rights Of Persons With Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPD) | 2016 | Public Sector, Private Sector | None |
11 | IRELAND | The Disability Act, 2005 | 2005 | Public Sector | WCAG 2.0 |
12 | ISRAEL | Equal Rights Of Persons With Disabilities Act, As Amended | 1998 | Public Sector, Private Sector | WCAG 2.0 |
13 | ITALY | Law 9 January 2004, N. 4 “Provisions To Facilitate The Access Of Disabled People To IT Tools” (Stanca Law) (Italian) | 2004 | Public Sector, Government | WCAG 2.0 |
14 | JAPAN | Basic Act On The Formation Of An Advanced Information And Telecommunications Network Society | 2000 | Public Sector, Private Sector | None |
15 | NETHERLANDS | Procurement Act 2012 (Dutch) | 2016 | Government | WCAG 2.0 |
16 | NORWAY | “Regulations On Universal Design Of Information And Communication Technology (ICT) Solutions (Norwegian)” | 2013 | Public Sector, Private Sector | WCAG 2.0 |
17 | REPUBLIC OF KOREA | Act On Prohibition Of Discrimination Against Persons With Disabilities And Remedy For Rights, Etc. (Korean) | 2008 | Public Sector, Private Sector | WCAG 2.0 |
18 | SWEDEN | Discrimination Act (2008:567) | 2008 | Public Sector, Private Sector | None |
19 | SWITERZLAND | Federal Law On The Elimination Of Inequalities Affecting People With Disabilities (French) | 2002 | Public Sector, Private Sector | WCAG 2.0 |
20 | TAIWAN | Website Accessibility Guidelines Version 2.0 (Chinese (Zhōngwén), Chinese, Chinese) | 2017 | Public Sector | WCAG 2.0 |
21 | UNITED KINGDOM | Equality Act 2010 | 2010 | Public Sector, Private Sector | WCAG 2.0 |
22 | UNITED STATES | Section 508 Of The US Rehabilitation Act Of 1973, As Amended | 1998 | Government | WCAG 2.0 |
Accessibility Metrics: How is Web Accessibility Measured?
Though there are different laws that are followed around the world, a majority of them are based on WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines). W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) developed WCAG and published it for the first time in 1999 in an effort to ensure accessibility on the internet. When it comes to accessibility metrics, web accessibility can be measured using three conformance levels, namely Level A, Level AA, and Level AAA. These 3 WCAG Compliance Levels have numerous success criteria that ensure accessibility to people with various disabilities.
Understanding the 3 WCAG Compliance Levels:
WCAG has developed these compliance levels with 4 primary guiding principles in mind. These 4 aspects are commonly referred to with the acronym POUR.
- Perceivable
- Operable
- Understandable
- Robust
The perceivable, operable, and understandable principles are pretty self-explanatory as every user should be able to perceive the content, operate or navigate through it, and understand it as well. Robust is focused on ensuring that they can do all the 3 in various devices to decrease numerous limitations. WCAG was first introduced in 1999 and has been going through constant upgrades by adding success criteria to meet the various accessibility needs. The most recent version of WCAG is WCAG 2.1 which was officially released in June 2018.
The 3 WCAG compliance levels are built around these guiding principles. Each level of compliance is built around the previous level. To put it in simple terms, If you have to attain level AAA compliance, you should satisfy all the success criteria from the AA compliance level. Likewise, if you wish to comply with AA level compliance, you should have satisfied all the success criteria of level A. So level A compliance is the most basic of the 3 available WCAG compliance levels. Since there are also no partial WCAG compliance levels, even if your website doesn’t satisfy one of the required success criteria, it will be termed non-compliant.
Level A Compliance: Minimum Level
Level A is the most basic level of accessibility that every website should aim to comply with. It solves the primal problem of people with disabilities finding your website unusable. Since each compliance level is built around its preceding levels, level A compliance lays the foundation for everything. Now let’s take a look at the 30 success criteria at this level.
If you are very new to accessibility, you may not be able to comprehend everything mentioned in the list. But this level of compliance ensures that people with visual impairments will be able to use screen readers effectively with the help of proper page structure and media alternatives such as alt-text for images, subtitles for videos, and so on. But it definitely doesn’t solve all the problems. So let’s see what level AA compliance has to offer.
Level AA Compliance: Acceptable Level
If level A is the bare basics, then Level AA is the Acceptance level of compliance a website can look to achieve to enhance the user experience for disabled people. In addition to the 30 success criteria that have to be met in level A compliance, an additional 20 success criteria also have to be satisfied. Of the 50 total success criteria at level AA, let’s take a look at the success criteria exclusive to this level in a categorized way.
We can see the additional focus on notable aspects like color contrast levels, well-defined roles and labels in form labels, status messages, and so on.
Level AAA Compliance: Optimal Level
Level AAA is the highest level of accessibility compliance that has an additional 28 success criteria that have to be satisfied. So the grand total of success criteria to be met for this level of compliance is 78 as of writing this blog. It is also the most difficult level of compliance to attain. Though achieving this level of compliance is hard, it has to be done if you are looking to build a specialist site for accessibility. Here is a list of the 28 success criteria that are exclusive to level AAA.
The level of difficulty in each of these success criteria is definitely high. For example, if you have a pre-recorded audio or video on your site, it definitely has to have sign language support. Since live videos are very uncommon on websites, the amount of work needed to achieve this is high. There are also focus areas such as mentioning the expanded form of abbreviations, providing context-sensitive help, and so on.
Which Disabilities Are Supported by WCAG?
Though there are numerous types of disabilities, not all disabilities are covered under the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines. Though there are new guidelines being added over time, as of now WCAG supports visual impairments, auditory disabilities, cognitive disabilities, and motor disabilities. The support is provided due to assistive technologies such as
- Screenreaders
- Braille Displays
- Text-to-speech systems
- Magnifiers
- Talking Devices
- Captioning
ARIA
Out of these assistive technologies, screen readers are the most used and so understanding what ARIA is and how it is used is an integral part of accessibility testing.
What is ARIA?
ARIA expanded as Accessible Rich Internet Applications, is a set of attributes that can be added to the HTML for developing more accessible web content applications. It is a W3C specification that fills in the gaps and makes up for the accessibility voids in regular HTML. It can be used to
- Help Screen readers and other assistive technologies perform better by improving the accessibility of interactive web elements.
- Enhances the Page Structure by defining helpful landmarks.
- Improves keyboard accessibility & interactivity.
Now let’s find out how ARIA improves accessibility by taking a look at the most commonly used ARIA attributes with the help of an example.
The most commonly used aria attributes:-
- 1. aria-checked.
- 2. Aria-disabled.
- 3. aria-expanded.
- 4. aria-haspopup.
- 5. Aria-hidden
- 6. Aria-labelledby
- 7. Aria-describedby
ARIA Attribute Example: Aria-checked
The aria-checked attribute can be used to denote the current state of checkboxes and radio buttons. So it will be able to indicate whether an element is checked or unchecked by using true and false statements. You can use JavaScript to ensure that the ARIA’s state changes when it is checked or unchecked.
- aria-checked=”true” indicates the element is checked.
- aria-checked=”false” indicates the element is in an unchecked state.
- aria-checked=”mixed” indicates partial check for elements that have tri-states
As the name of all the other commonly used attributes suggests, they can be used to indicate if a list is expanded, if there is a pop-up, and so on.
Web-Accessibility Testing Tutorial
Accessibility testing is very much different from the regular types of software testing and might seem daunting to many. As seen in the ‘How Accessibility is Measured’ section, there are 3 different WCAG compliance levels. So we will now be focusing on the various success criteria from the A-level compliance. To make it even easier for you to perform these tests, we have broken down the entire accessibility testing process based on the different web elements and content types we will generally add to a website. Once we have covered all that, we will then explore how to ensure general accessibility.
Page Title
The page title is one of the most basic properties of a web page that helps us differentiate the numerous webpages that appear in the search results on Google or when multiple webpages are opened in a browser. We will easily be able to see and identify the difference. But if you’re using a screen reader, it will not read out the domain name. And if the Page Titles are similar, it’ll become hard for the user to know the difference. So make sure to test if the titles clearly convey what the webpage is about.
Best Practice:
<html>
<head>
<title>How to do accessibility testing</title>
</head>
</html>
Bad Practice:
<html>
<head>...</head>
<body>...</body>
</html>
Places to Check:
- Browser Tab.
- Search Engine results page.
- Bookmarks.
- Title of other pages within the same website. (Eg. Blog Articles)
Structure check
Now that we have seen how the title can impact a disabled person’s usability, let’s shift to the structure of the webpage. A complicated structure can confuse even a regular end-user. So using a well-planned and clean structure will make it easier for regular users to scan through and read your content while making it accessible for people with cognitive and visual disabilities.
Checklist:
- 1. Check if the page has a defined header and footer.
- 2. Validate the main landmark and the complementary landmarks by navigating to specific sections.
- 3. Test the flow of the Heading structure.
- 4. If there are numbered lists, bullet lists, or tables, check if they are read properly by the screenreader.
- 5. Test if the bypass blocks work using a screen reader.
- 6. Check if the webpage is coded with human-readable language that can be programmatically determined by assistive technologies.
- 7. Check if the basic structural elements like sections, paragraphs, quotes(blackquotes), etc. have been defined properly.
- 8. Check for hyperlinks on the page and ensure that the anchor text is descriptive enough to convey the change of context to the user.
Headings
Headings in a webpage are very crucial as it outlines the main content of the page and helps convey which parts are important. So if your webpage has more than 1 Heading 1, doesn’t have any headings, or doesn’t follow a proper hierarchy, it will definitely cause confusion. That is why the heading structure flow is recommended to go from H1 to H6 even though it is not mandatory.
Best Practice:
*Heading level 1<h1>
*Heading level 2<h2>
*Heading level3<h3>
*Heading level4<h4>
*Heading level5<h5>
*Heading level6<h6>
*Heading level3<h3>
*Heading level4<h4>
*Heading level5<h5>
*Heading level6<h6>
*Heading level 2<h2>
*Heading level3<h3>
*Heading level4<h4>
Bad Practice:
*Heading level 1<h1>
*Heading level 2<h2>
*Heading level3<h3>
*Heading level 1<h1>
*Heading level 4<h4>
*Heading level5<h5>
Tables
Tables are used to present the data in an organized way and in logical order. The table should have a table header, the table header should be marked up with ‘th’. And the data inside the cells should be marked up with ‘td’. If there are any highly complex tables, check if the scope header and id have been provided.
Good Practice:
<table>
<tr>
<th>Types of Disabilities</th>
<th>Description</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vision</td>
<td>People who have low vision, complete blindness and partial blindness</td>
</tr>
</table>
Bad Practice:
<table>
<tr>
<td>Vision</td>
<td>People who have low vision, complete blindness and partial blindness</td>
</tr>
</table>
Checklist:
- Verify if all the column or row data are read out along with the respective column or row headers.
- Ensure that the number of total rows and columns are properly readout.
- Check if the row and column numbers are correctly readout when the focus shifts to them.
Lists
Typing out over-long paragraphs and not using lists in pages can greatly reduce the readability for even regular users. The right usage of lists can make it very easy for people with visual impairments using screen readers or for even people suffering from disabilities like Dyslexia. But if the proper HTML coding isn’t used in the lists, screen readers might just read all the words together like a sentence and confuse the user. Since there are 3 types of lists (Unordered list, Ordered list, and Descriptive list), we have shown what the proper code structure will look like.
Good Practice
<ul>
<li>Apple</li>
<li>Orange</li>
</ul>
<ol>
‘ <li>Vision</li>
<li>Speech</li>
</ol>
<dl>
<dt>Disabilities</dt>
<dd>Vision</dd>
<dd>Speech</dd>
</dl>
Other common components seen in various websites are text boxes, buttons, dropdowns, and so on. Since the user should be able to interact with these web elements, it is important for them to have accessible names and proper ARIA labels for the screen reader to read them properly.
Checklist:
- 1. Check if proper attributes are used for all required fields as the screen reader should be able to announce to the user that it is a required field.
- 2. If there are any radio buttons, check if they are grouped together.
- 3. Check if all elements should receive focus when navigating using the tab key.
- 4. If there are any errors in an input field, check if the error is mentioned and read out by the screen reader.
- 5. Check if all the dropdown options have aria attributes like “aria-expanded” and “aria-collapsed”.
- 6. Verify that the pop-up content has an ARIA attribute as “aria-haspopup”.
- 7. Check if all buttons have proper ARIA labels that help the user understand their usage.
- 8. Verify that the aria attributes for alert contents are implemented correctly.
Multimedia Content
Multimedia content such as images, audio, and videos will not be accessible to people with various disabilities. But there are steps developers can take to make them accessible to all by
- Adding alt text or long descriptions to images.
- Adding Closed Captions, transcripts, and audio descriptions for videos and audios.
Images – Alt text
Alt-text is nothing but the alternative text that explains the purpose or content of images, charts, and flowcharts for the people who will not be able to see them. So when an image is bought to focus, the screen reader will be able to read out the provided alternative text. If it is a very complex visual that requires more than 140 characters, then we could opt to use long descriptions over alt text.
<div>
<img style=”” src=”” alt=”” width=””>
</div>
The job doesn’t end by checking if the alt text is present or not, we should ensure that the alt text fulfills its purpose by carrying out the checks from the below checklist.
Checklist
- 1. Check if the alt text is descriptive enough to convey the intent or info from the image.
- 2. Be clear when using terms prone to misconception like ‘Apple’. Users might get confused if we are talking about the company named Apple or the fruit named Apple.
- 3. Make sure the alt text is not used as a holder of keywords for the various SEO needs.
- 4. Text alternatives are not needed for decorative images as they will not affect the user in understanding the main content of the page. For example, consider a tick mark near the text that says “Checkpoint”. Here it is not mandatory to mention the tick mark.
Videos & Audios
Things get a little more complicated when other multimedia contents such as videos and audio have to be added. We would have to verify if these multimedia contents are supported by closed captions, audio descriptions, or transcripts. Let’s take a look at each of these assistive technologies.
Closed captions & Transcripts
A visually impaired person will be able to understand the context of videos with dialogues or conversations. But what if a person with a hearing disability watches the same video? Though there are auto-generated captions, they are not that reliable. That is why it is important to include closed captions or transcripts for all the videos/audio you add. Though transcripts are not mandatory, they will be effective when used for podcasts, interviews, or conversations. So a person with hearing impairment can read the transcript if they wish to.
Checklist:
- 1. Check if the closed captions are in sync with the video.
- 2. Validate if the subtitles have been mapped word-by-word.
- 3. Make sure the closed captions are visible within the player.
- 4. If it is a conversational video, make sure the name of the speaker is also mentioned.
- 5. Check if all the numeric values are mentioned properly.
- 6. Make sure the closed captions mention important background audio elements such as applause, silence, background score, footsteps, and so on.
Audio Description
But what if the video doesn’t have any or much dialogues or conversations? What if the visuals are a key to understanding the video? Then employing subtitles alone will never be enough. That is where audio descriptions come into play as they will describe all the actions that are happening in the visual and help users understand it clearly.
Checklist
- 1. Ensure the description makes it possible for visually impaired users to create a clear mental image in their minds.
- 2. Make sure the audio description covers every action, activity, silence, animation, expression, facial expression, and so on.
- 3. The paused screen when the audio description is playing should be clearly visible and no text, image, or element should be blurred or misaligned.
- 4. Check if all the on-screen text is available correctly in the audio description.
- 5. Validate if all the activities and on-screen elements are in sync with the Audio description.
- 6. The screen should be paused at the same instance which is being described in the audio description.
Animations, Moving and blinking Contents
Animations, scroll effects, and such dynamic content are being widely used on various websites. As debunked earlier, accessibility guidelines don’t prevent us from doing so. Rather, it just guides us in implementing it in the right and usable way.
Checklist
- 1. Ensure all animations that are over 5 seconds in length have the provision to play, pause, or stop them.
- 2. If there are any blinking or flashing contents, ensure that it doesn’t flash more than 3 times in one second as it might affect people prone to seizures.
Color Contrast
A general rule to keep in mind when developing or adding such content is to ensure there is proper color contrast between the background color and foreground elements such as text, buttons, graphs, and so on. Be it a table, image, video, form, or any content type we have seen, a lack of proper color usage can make it hard for even regular users to view the content without any difficulty. So it is needless to say that people with low vision or color blindness will find it impossible to access the content. The preferred color of the background is white and the foreground is black.
Now that we have covered all the aspects of adding different types and categories of content, let’s progress to the usage aspects that you must know when it comes to accessibility testing.
Keyboard Control & Interaction
People with visual impairments and motor disabilities will not be able to use a mouse in the same way a regular user can. So using braille keyboards or regular will be the only option they have. The most important key on the keyboard will be the ‘Tab’ key as it will help navigate to all the interactive web elements. You can use the ‘Shift+Tab’ keys combination to move in the backward direction.
- Test if all the web elements receive focus when you hit the tab key. Also, check if the focus shifts from that element when the tab key is pressed again.
- The element in focus will be highlighted with a gray outline. So, test if it is visible as it will be helpful for people with motor disabilities.
- Ensure that the focus order is from left to right or right to left based on the language in use.
- For web elements such as drop-down lists, ensure that all the options are read out by the screen reader when navigating using the arrow keys.
- If there is any video or a carousel, the user must be able to control (Pause/Play/Volume Control) it using the keyboard actions alone.
- Likewise, if there are any auto-play functionalities, check if the playback stops in 3 seconds or provides an option to control the playback.
- If an interactive element does not receive the tab focus, then the element should be coded with “tab index=0”.
To make it easier for the users to access the web page with different input options such as the touchscreen on mobiles, and tablets without using the keyboard. While thinking about checking the web page without keyboard keys, we can use pointer cancellation, pointer gestures, and motion actuation.
Zooming
Since there are various types of visual impairments, people with low vision might be able to access the content on the webpage without the use of a screen reader. So we have to zoom in and view the page at 200 and 400% zoom levels and check for
- Text Overlaps
- Truncating issues
Other Checks
From all the points we have discussed above, it is obvious that any instructions or key elements that are crucial for understanding and operating the content should not rely only on sensory characteristics. For example, if there is a form to be completed, then the completion of the form shouldn’t be denoted with a bell sound alone as people who have hearing impairments will not be able to access it. Likewise, showing just a visual or color change to denote completion will also not be accessible to all.
If there are any defined time limits, make sure that people with disabilities will be able to use them correctly. So if we take a session expiration as an example.
- Check if the user is able to turn off or adjust the time limit before it starts.
- The adjusting limit should be at least 10 times more than the default setting.
- Make sure there are accessible warning messages before expiration and that there is at least a 20-second time gap for the user to extend the session with a simple action such as typing the space key.
- It is important to keep in mind that there are exceptions for expirations such as an online test as the ability to extend the provided time limit would invalidate the existence of a time limit. Likewise, these criteria can be exempted if the time limit is more than 20 hours or if a real-time event such as an auction is being conducted.
Most common Accessibility issues
So what kind of issues can you expect when following the above-mentioned checklist? Here’s a list of the most common accessibility issues that will give you a heads up about the various issues you will encounter when performing accessibility testing. Please note that this is not a comprehensive list and that you have to keep your eyes open for any unexpected accessibility issues that might come your way.
- 1. Heading level issues
- 2. Incorrect implementation of list tags
- 3. Missing alt-text for images
- 4. Incorrect focus order
- 5. Missing tab focus for interactive web elements
- 6. Poor Color Contrast
- 7. Incorrect reading order
- 8. Missing ARIA labels
- 9. State not announced.
- 10. Improper table implementation
- 11. Inability to access the contents using keyboard keys
- 12. Content is not visible at 400 % and 200% zoom levels
- 13. Screen reader not notifying alert messages
- 14. Screen reader not reading the dropdown list
- 15. Lack of expanded and collapsed state implementation
- 16. Missing closed captions, audio descriptions, or video transcripts for videos
Challenges of Accessibility Testing
There is no task without any challenges and Accessibility Testing also does come with its own share of challenges.
Dynamic Websites
Dynamic websites tend to have 100 or 1000’s changes every minute or every hour. So implementing web accessibility for dynamic content inside such web pages is considered to be very hard due to the presence of third-party content like ads and other such factors.
Large Websites
Though it would be easier to work with static content in comparison, it would still be a mammoth challenge if it has to be implemented for over 1000 pages in retrospect. So the next major challenge in implementing accessibility is the scale of the website as the more the number of pages, the higher the variety of content that will be available.
Limited Automation Scope
The scope for automating web accessibility tests is very low as even if we write scripts to detect the images with or without alt-text, it only solves half the problem. What if the alt-text is present but not descriptive enough or relevant to that image? We would once again need a manual tester to validate it. Lack of conformance verification is what makes scaling web accessibility tests with automation a challenge.
Test Artifacts over the User Experience
The focus of WCAG and its success criteria are primarily on technical artifacts and not on the user’s journey and goals. To put it in simple terms, their guidelines are only focused on the webpage as seen earlier, and not on the user experience. The clear gap between accessibility and the user experience can be bridged if the accessibility testing team focused on the user experience while performing testing. And that is why we ensure to train our accessibility testers to test by keeping the user experience in mind.
Web Accessibility Testing Tools
Since disabled people use various assistive technologies, as a tester you should know how to use those technologies too. That’s just the first step, as you should also use the assistive technology in a way that a real person with disabilities will use it. Putting yourself in their perspective is the key to maximizing the scope of usage. There are dedicated screen readers that come with built-in various devices and platforms. Though there will be various similarities when it comes to the usage of these screen readers, you should know how to use them individually.
Inbuilt List of Screen Readers
- Narrator for Windows
- ORCA for Linux
- Voiceover for macOS and iOS
- Talkback for Android
- ChromeVox for Chromebooks
Other Popular Screen Readers
- JAWS for Windows (Commercial)
- NVDA for Windows (Free)
Apart from these assistive technologies, we also employ a set of tools to ease the accessibility testing process. While no tool will work without human validation, it is still handy to have such options to speed up the evaluation process. In order to speed things up, even more, we also use various browser extensions and bookmarklets such as,
- Wave
- Color Contrast Analyzer
- arc & axe
Conclusion
So that pretty much sums everything up you will need to know to get started with accessibility testing. We hope you found our guide easier to understand when compared to the other conventional options as we have broken down the checks based on the different web elements as they are more tangible. Make sure to subscribe to our newsletter as we will be posting such highly useful content on a weekly basis. Have any doubts? Ask them in the comments section and we will try our best to answer them.