Select Page

Blog

Category Selected: Automation Testing

190 results Found

Load More

People also read

Automation Testing

Playwright + TypeScript Is the Future of End-to-End Testing

author-image

Rajesh K Posted on Oct 23, 2025

Blog

API vs UI Testing in 2025: A Strategic Guide for Modern QA Teams

author-image

Rajesh K Posted on Oct 16, 2025

AI Testing

Stagehand – AI-Powered Browser Automation

author-image

Rajesh K Posted on Oct 07, 2025

Categories

Subscribe

Subscribe to Codoid

Sign up for our newsletter to never miss out on our latest blogs.

Talk to our Experts

Amazing clients who
trust us

poloatto
ABB
polaris
ooredo
stryker
mobility
Why Automation Testing is Critical at Any Scale?

Why Automation Testing is Critical at Any Scale?

by | Jul 26, 2019 | Automation Testing, Blog | 0 comments

The digital domain has cast an all-pervasive shadow on human existence, with such trends gaining momentum even as attempts are made to bridge the gap between the realms of analog and the digital. Test Automation represents one of the core ideas molding the domain of modern software testing. This ties closely with the considerable abilities of the digital domain, in that Test Automation confers greater flexibility on software testers that choose to test at any time. This implies testing engineers can schedule test case execution at any hour of the day, thereby matching client preferences and meeting urgent deadlines and business goals. Managing automated testing with super efficiency is critical at any scale and at any stage.

Smooth Release Cycles

The use of Automated Test schedules help to ease the task of regression testing. This stems from the fact automated test casing represents a one-time effort that can be applied repeatedly in a variety of test scenarios. Therefore, Automation Testing defeats the time constraints that are usually associated with software development and release cycles. In addition, this form of testing ensures uniformity in the execution of testing practices and procedures; it removes the element of variability that perpetually emerges in the course of manual testing activities.

Reusability is Key

Why Automation Testing is Critical

Automation Testing empowers test professionals with the ability to reuse their testing scripts. This form of testing, therefore, amplifies the outcomes of deploying meticulously constructed testing scripts in a variety of contexts that center on software testing activities. This fact encourages testing organizations to deploy QA Automation systems for the benefit of the client or customer. It is apparent that Test Automation allows considerable savings in terms of time and costs, while ensuring steady outcomes.

Review Testing Reports

Automation Testing bestows significant benefits when we consider the fine details generated by software testing activities. This form of software testing allows QA Automation personnel to review the work of other engineers, assess the quality of testing scripts already in use, the range and scope of software testing, review lists of glitches and flaws unearthed and remedied, and several other activities. This surfeit of information allows for a richer testing experience and ultimately leads to the creation of a competent digital product./p>

Maximize Return on Investment

Most experts in the software testing domain agree a roadmap is crucial to ensure positive outcomes for any Automation Testing exercise. Such a map allows organizations and Test Automation professionals to achieve clarity in terms of the goals and objectives. Once these are defined, QA Automation allows developers and testers to cut the scope for confusion in testing schedules and testing activities. The downstream effects of such activities may include a higher return on investment for the testing organization.

Efficient Use of Time and Resources

Automation Testing takes the proverbial grunt work out of software testing activities, allowing testing professionals and Automated Test engineers to focus on creating expansive test cases that generate a positive impact on the performance of the software application or package. In addition, this form of testing empowers test professionals to register high levels of productivity in the workplace and speed up the software testing process. These factors are crucial inputs in the work performance of a QA Automation organization. They also help generate client delight and add substance to the bottom line of said organization.

Why Automation Testing is Critical

Complementary Test Strategies

Test Automation frameworks register a crucial departure from the limitations imposed by manual software testing processes. An Automated Test strategy allows testers to execute parallel testing and cloud-based testing in the interests of conducting comprehensive testing exercises. This is significant because cloud technologies are gaining significance in the realms of software development and testing. In addition, testers can deploy Test Automation strategies to execute testing in different environments, which may include variations in Web traffic.

Quality of Software

Veteran testers corroborate the fact that Automation Testing enforces quality standards in the software development and testing processes. This implies significant benefits for downstream users because they gain the benefit of using (or reviewing) a bug-free software product. In addition, Automation Testing confers business benefits in terms of enabling software developers create and include new features within a new software application. Automation also leads to shorter development cycles, thereby enforcing the integrity of a body of computer code in all stages of the testing cycle.

Faster Feedback

QA Automation methods often enable faster feedback mechanisms, which help to arrest the incidence of bugs and glitches inside an application or product. This holds true for different phases of a software development project, thereby creating real benefits for all stakeholders. Further, Automated Test mechanisms offer definitive time savings, which translates into commercial benefits even for mission-critical development projects. This form of testing also helps reduce business expenses for any organization that offers QA Automation services.

In Conclusion

These insights and analyses allow the appreciation of the significance of automated testing in multiple scenarios. The ongoing evolution of digital technologies may reinforce these benefits in the future, while creating potentially greater scope for new testing methods and applications. We are future ready and are consistently helping our clients to get there too – ahead of the crowd. Connect with us to gain all these benefits and more.

Adopting Behavior Driven Testing within Automated Testing

Adopting Behavior Driven Testing within Automated Testing

by | Jun 20, 2019 | Automation Testing, Blog | 0 comments

Behavior Driven Testing drives focus to the requirements and the business point of view, as opposed to focusing too much on testing the technical implementation. Behavior Driven Testing uses easily understandable language to broadcast product ideas. The objective of such testing is to ensure everyone on the team gains a clear understanding of testing objectives.

In line with this, Behavior Driven Testing allows non-technical people, who are in charge of business analysis and product management, to actively join the testing process. This form of software testing is gaining significant momentum since modern organizations are viewing it as a solution to challenges posed by automation testing and collaboration.

Behavior Driven Testing within Automated Testing

Some testing experts aver, “The goal of behavior driven testing is a business readable and domain specific language that allows you to describe a system’s behavior without detailing how that behavior is implemented.” (Further), “behavior driven tests in the form of plain text feature descriptions with scenarios and are typically written before anything else and verified by the non-technical stakeholders.”

Drives Collaboration

Behavior Driven Testing builds closer relationships among business analysts, QA groups, and software development teams through the Behavior Clarification Reviews. This form of software testing, lends itself well to automation testing and helps communicate requirements effectively; however, the requirements have to be verified by business analysts and testers before they reach a common ground for acceptance criteria.

Easy Review and Feedback

Behavior Driven Testing requires no development skills because this form of testing hinges on writing the test cases in natural language (which is human-readable). Hence, non-coding professionals such as business analysts can actively participate in the process of automation testing and creating automated test cases, review the same, and offer feedback for improvements.

Easy Automation

Business teams review testing scenarios, developed by manual testers; following this, an automation engineer can develop the step definitions for the scenario steps. The path to automation testing runs through the QA team, which automates the scenarios; once executed, glitches that emerge are remediated. The automated tests are run as regression tests, following which the user accepts the software by certifying that acceptance and quality criteria have been met.

QA team

Focus on Testing Behavior

Since Behavior Driven Testing focuses on testing behavior, testers can implement automation testing by building detailed automated unit tests. Testers therefore, must develop test cases keeping the scenario in mind, not just code implementation. In doing so, testers would not need to change the test, inputs, and outputs should the requirements undergo change. This makes unit Test Automation much faster, less tedious, and more accurate.

Ease of Implementation

The availability of a large range of open source Behavior Driven Testing frameworks remains key to the success of “automation testing”. “Test Automation” demands the Behavior Driven Testing layer is positioned on top of a customized framework. Subsequently, the Behavior Driven Tests are given the when-then style steps written in natural language. However, testers must implement these steps in a programming language of their choice.

Areas of Concern

Skilled technical resources are required to build and maintain the automation testing framework that will enable Behavior Driven Testing. This approach to development differs significantly from other popular automation tools. In addition, certain scenarios may emerge wherein the tests written by the manual tester (or business analysts) do not lend themselves to automation. However, Behavior Driven Testing does not require specific documentation because the feature file serves as the requirement specifications or repository of use cases.

In Conclusion:

Behavior Driven Testing (BDT) is not a frequently used term in the realm of software testing and or development. This is because the testing focuses on user behavior and not the technical performance and functions of the software, and is used to highlight the requirements of a product and the point of view of the business. Our experts understand the use of BDT as a solution and premise for implementing data driven testing – connect with us to achieve this more speedily and successfully in a consistent manner.

Ensuring Automated Software Testing is Consistently Successful

Ensuring Automated Software Testing is Consistently Successful

by | Jun 15, 2019 | Automation Testing, Blog | 0 comments

Software testing represents an integral part of modern software development cycles and processes. In recent times, automated testing processes have emerged as part of techniques designed to aid the creation of flawless software packages that conform to all mission parameters. Contemporary definitions of automated software testing indicate it “is an automatic technique where the tester writes scripts by own and uses suitable software to test the software. Like regression testing, automation testing also used to test the application from load, performance and stress point of view.”

Best Suited for Large Projects

This form of software testing is well-suited when testers are involved in projects of significant reach and scope. The utility of such Test Automation stems from the fact large projects require testing the same areas in repeated patterns. The utility extends to software development projects that have already undergone an initial manual testing process.

Reduced Testing Time

The use of automated software testing systems and procedures reduces the time spent on such exercises. These time savings can now be invested in activities wherein software coders can refine the test procedures, improve the quality of such tests, and adjust the duration of testing cycles. Further, valid Test Automation schedules, systems, and procedures can be re-used in the service of future software development plans.

Reduced Testing Time

Correct Allocation of Resources

A successful Automation Testing regimen is ideally preceded by the allocation of human resources, budgets, the delineation of testing needs, the selection of appropriate testing technology, etc. Each of these criteria, when adequately fulfilled, leads to the execution of a successful Test Automation system. Such actions require advance planning on the part of project personnel in order to meet with success in the testing mission.

Which Test Cases to Automate

The proper selection of test cases is a pre-requisite for successful Automation Testing. This action stems from the realization that not every single aspect of testing can be automated. Hence, code testers and software developers must arrive at common ground in terms of determining which test cases should be automated. In line with this, tests that must be performed only infrequently can remain outside a Test Automation regime. In contrast, test cases that run frequently and require large amounts of data must find priority inclusion in said regimes.

Focus on a single objective

When software developers set about creating Automation Testing regimes, they must retain a narrow focus on a single, stated objective. This is important to ensure the success of an automated software testing paradigm. Testers may, for instance, develop separate tests for read-only software functions and read/write functions. This approach empowers testers to use these individual tests repeatedly without invoking the whole testing regime.

Ensuring Automated Software Testing is Consistently Successful

Select the Right Testing Methodology

Automation Testing plans are best served when testers choose the right testing methodology, the correct plan, and monitor test coverage. As part of these actions, testers are required to build a pitch; this testing process validates the software product prior to delivery. In recent times, most software testers and coders have adopted the Agile testing methodology. Time savings inherent in this testing methodology drive this preference, as do consistent sprints that enhance the testing process, and higher levels of client satisfaction with the product.

Advance Preparation of Test Cases & Scenario

Experts recommend testers identify the test scenario and create test cases prior to executing Automation Testing systems & procedures. The preparation of test cases in advance allows testers and coders to identify the test execution times and potential defects in the body of computer code to be tested. Advance preparation for Test Automation also helps identify other scenarios and workflows of the application that hold potential for successful automation.

Utilize Quality Test Data

Quality test data is intrinsic for successful QA Automation. This implies that data size should be optimal and must contain information (and components) that are relevant for application testing requirements. In addition, testers should undertake best practices by perusing data sets that are combined and separated into different categories. These categories include valid data, invalid data, boundary condition, etc. As a corollary, testers must work to ensure the data that is referred for testing consistently defeats the threat of obsolescence and remains updated from time-to-time.

Review Tests Periodically

Coders and software testers must review test data and test cases at regular intervals with a view to identify the data’s validity for undergoing tests. Such actions also help identify unnecessary and outdated tests that are no longer relevant to the current test cycle. The real world outcomes of such actions includes reduced costs and maintenance efforts for software developer(s). In addition, a consistent review of tests allows developers to validate and verify the substance of tests; this casts long-term effects on the test automation project.

In Conclusion

Automated software testing is usually a neglected part of software development, which can prove to be a costly mistake. The overlooking of testing is usually the result of the many challenges it poses for testers. Detecting bugs and errors requires in-depth experience, dedicated teams, and expertise – which together ensure that even the minutest errors and bugs can be detected early on. It is good business sense for any company to outsource this and other critical software testing tasks to a professional service provider – connect with us to gain the advantage of successful automated software testing.

Optimizing Tests for Continuous Integration

Optimizing Tests for Continuous Integration

by | Apr 29, 2019 | Automation Testing, Blog | 0 comments

Continuous Integration (CI) is a powerful strategy in software development, especially in agile environments. Software testers are increasingly using the practice of Continuous Integration in automated tests for assessing test suites in terms of value.

Continuous Integration allows frequent execution of software tests and, therefore, enables testers to fix problems shortly after spotting them. With developers integrating codes into a shared repository at frequent intervals, automated tests can verify the integrations regularly if an organization has a Continuous Integration program in place.

Optimizing Tests for Continuous Integration

To optimize tests for Continuous Integration, some beneficial practices that organizations should follow are listed below, which can be effectively managed by an expert software testing company.

Creating Small, Valuable Test SuitesA leading and renowned QA company will corroborate the fact that tests can be optimized for Continuous Integration effectively if a small suite of some important, gross-level tests is created. The tests comprising the small suite should typically include build acceptance tests, build verification tests or other vital tests that can qualify the system or application for further tests. Upon the successful execution of these tests, testers can advance to other tests.

Building an Automated Testing FrameworkThe demarcation of development phases is somewhat blurred in agile environments since each new code committed by a developer triggers a new build cycle. Hence, tests runs need to be executed several times during the test phase. The inclusion of several tests in a Continuous Integration suite, together with some shell scripting, can trigger tests automatically on a regular basis. An automated testing framework enables testers to easily identify the change that causes a failed test run.

Using Automation across Different Types of TestingCompanies striving to offer top-notch QA services should ensure that the automation framework they build for optimizing tests for Continuous Integration should cover a diverse range of tests. Some of the functional and non-functional tests that should be part of the coverage of automation testing include Load testing, Performance Testing, Stress Testing, Regression Testing, Acceptance Testing, and Database testing, among others.

Updating the Test Setup for Faster ExecutionTests can be optimized for Continuous Integration if the test setup is refactored to enable a faster execution. An updated or restructured test setup code can lead to an overall improvement in testing services since failures due to timing issues or other minor problems would be avoided. For effectively refactoring the test setup, testers should first examine the performance of their tests with the existing test setup and then consider the possibility of an enhanced setup.

Replacing Sleep Statements with Wait Statements

However, for optimizing tests for Continuous Integration, testers should be smart with their wait times. Testers mostly use sleep statements as a temporary workaround for flaky tests that consistently fail due to the ongoing loading of some resources, or a non-responding back end.

Selenium Wait Statements

They should avoid sleep statements and, instead, use wait statements that end in coincidence with the occurrence of an event rather than ending after a stipulated period.

Running Tests Suites in ParallelTest suites that take a long time to execute should be broken up into different suites and run in parallel, especially to keep pace with consistent software integration. Parallel test runs, facilitated by a robust automated testing mechanism, optimize testing for Continuous Integration given frequent execution. In addition, parallel testing also leads to improved test coverage and fewer unidentified bugs.

Avoiding the Execution of Unit Tests with Integrated TestsTo optimize tests for Continuous Integration, testers must understand the difference between unit tests and integrated tests, and avoid running them together. Unit tests are aimed at basic code correction. They are fast and need to be run frequently for early detection of bugs in business logic. In contrast, integrated tests take a notably longer execution time. Identifying the cause of a failed integrated test is a complex process because of their vast span across several modules and devices.

Logging Extensively to Analyze FailureExtensive logging holds immense significance in analyzing a failed test since it uncovers the root of the problem. For this reason, extensive logging can play a key role in optimizing tests for Continuous Integration. However, extensive logging should be done only when required because it may have an adverse effect on performance. Moreover, it is pertinent to use a competent logging framework capable of identifying cases for minimal logging and exhaustive logging.

In Conclusion:

Optimizing tests for Continuous Integration has become a crucial software development practice in recent years because of its key principles of automated testing, build automation, revision control, and greater accuracy. When tests are optimized for Continuous Integration, the degree of errors during software development drops drastically owing to increased automation, quicker bug fixes, and an efficient feedback mechanism. Connect with our team of experts to help your business with this critical to success activity.

Secrets of Succeeding at Test Automation

Secrets of Succeeding at Test Automation

by | Apr 26, 2019 | Automation Testing, Blog | 0 comments

Test automation (also called automated testing) is a crucial ‘quality assurance’ process in software testing. It is essentially a ‘programming’ mechanism, which is designed by a test automation company for controlling the execution of software tests. An effective test automation process can quickly eliminate the errors or defects in software, and ensure that the software delivers the projected results.

Test automation can be described simply as ‘a software application that tests another software application.’ It is deemed a success when the actual outcomes of software testing correspond to the expected outcomes, thereby ensuring that the software meets its requirements. Some of the secrets of successful test automation companies are:

Secrets of Succeeding at Test Automation

A ‘Requirement-driven’ Approach

Test automation requires focus on the requirements of the software to be tested. When the process is aligned with business goals, the functional and non-functional needs of the software can be met effectively. Such a ‘requirement-driven’ approach can lead to comprehensive test coverage of codes, and a successful test automation initiative.

Specialists for Designing Testing Code

Success in test automation greatly depends on the testing code because the quality of the code governs the entire software testing process. Therefore, organizations using test automation should avail the services of expert who specialize at designing testing codes. A high-quality testing code does not only make the existing test automation initiative a success, but can also become an important asset for an organization in the future.

Excellent Defect Detection

The number of software bugs or defects detected by the test automation process determines the effectiveness and success of the software. The defect-detection ability of test automation validates the robustness of the testing mechanism for an organization. The failure of test automation to discover bugs can be a cause of concern and can practically make the testing process redundant.

Modular Test Plan

The test automation framework should have a modular design, so that it has the agility for changes or breaks in tests during the course of the testing process. A modular test plan, built using small and independent test cases, underscores a ‘layered’ automated testing system that facilitates the refactoring of code when required. Such a design can ensure that automation efforts match up with software development efforts of the developers.

Integration of Software Testing with Software Development

To succeed in its test automation initiatives, an organization should integrate its software testing mechanism with the software development process. This integration can lead to better testing and quicker delivery of results since test automation would help achieve the core objectives of accelerating development, offering extensive code coverage, and assisting in keeping timeline overruns in check.

Involvement of Manual Testers

Automated programming has certain limitations because of which test automation may not be a complete testing mechanism on its own. Hence, it is important for a automation testing company to combine the expertise of automation engineers with that of manual testers and domain experts. Test automation can be successful if manual testers are also involved in some part of the testing process, especially since exploratory testing and certain other tests can be carried out only by manual testers.

Top-notch Testing Infrastructure

A well-organized testing infrastructure is one of the key quality assurance assets of test automation companies. When a QA company has a good testing infrastructure, the quality of test automation initiatives can improve significantly due to better software testing and downtime management.

Identifying the Best Candidates for Automation

For test automation to be a success, it is important that testing teams identify the best candidates for automation before actually conducting automated tests. Largely, the best automation candidates are those who specialize in testing of several kinds – functional, unit, integration, regression, smoke, and performance.

Cost-effectiveness in Long Term

The special software tools used in test automation process are expensive, and can increase the overall costs for an organization. Therefore, for test automation to succeed, it is important that the process is cost-effective in the long term. To achieve this goal, employing manual testing alongside automated testing makes business sense. In addition, the repeated use of test automation in regression testing can also make the process cost-effective.

In Conclusion:

The success of test automation largely depends on its ability to run software testing quickly and repeatedly. Automated testing would be a success for an organization if it is a more convenient, effective and time saving testing process as compared to manual testing. An organization aware of the secrets of succeeding at test automation can design and implement an excellent automated testing process, which can help software achieve its expected results. Connect with us to uncover all these secrets and more.

What Are The Most Common Issues Affecting Automated Testing?

What Are The Most Common Issues Affecting Automated Testing?

by | May 11, 2019 | Automation Testing, Blog | 0 comments

In the present-day Agile Development environments, automated testing has gained immense significance. With the help of automation, testers can prepare test data, and execute complex test cases that may be located in diverse platforms.

Despite the increasing use of automated testing, there are several problems affecting the automated processes. Due to these issues, automated testing may fail to deliver any value – which makes it pertinent to highlight some of them:

Problems Rooted in the Test Automation Mechanism

Automated Testing is gaining ground in recent times because it can accelerate the release cycles of software. However, the process has certain limitations that can sometimes put a spanner in the release cycle and affect future releases.

Common Issues Affecting Automated Testing

Specifically, if there are problems with the automation script, the testing process may fail, and the testers may not know whether the failure is because of the site or the script. In addition, another problem with automation is the unrealistic expectation that each time they are executed, automated tests will be able to find new defects.

Improper Approach to Testing

Automated testing does not simply revolve around the creation of effective testing scripts. It also requires a correct testing approach in accordance with the frequent changes in the Agile Environment. Automation may not be productive for an organization with poor testing practices because it may lead to exhaustive efforts in implementing and maintaining test scripts and test suites. If tests are poorly organized and documentation is incoherent, it may be difficult for testers to generate useful test reports and metrics. It would therefore, make good business sense to hire the services of an expert software testing company for this and other realms.

Lack of Detailed Technical Knowledge of Automation Tools

A test automation company usually emphasizes the proficiency of its testers in using various automation tools. There are however, several automation tools – like Selenium, Katalon, Cucumber, Cypress, Karate, and many others – for different testing purposes, and testers may not be experts at the optimal use of a specific tool. Wrong selection of tools can hinder test coverage, and the overall costs of tools may exceed the testing budget of an organization. Choosing a company that is proficient in a wide range of such tools will get you more value for every buck spent and every effort expended as a business.

Oversight of Environment Issues during Testing

Testers performing automated tests are chiefly focused on detecting functional bugs rather than considering ‘environment issues.’ Although the delivery pipeline is the backbone of software development and delivery in DevOps, testers generally overlook the problems in the test environments, the CI server, and the deployment scripts. An oversight of ‘environment issues’ can drastically affect the development and testing effort. It can also decelerate the deployment process.

Oversight of Environment Issues during Testing

Omission of Key Scenarios

In most Agile development environments, testers often tend to miss the key scenarios because they do not give due consideration to the crucial ‘Scenario Workshop’ activity. Since the detection of bugs is associated with test scenarios, the omission of key scenarios may result in serious issue leaks into production. Therefore, if testers do not create or test a particular scenario, even repeated automated tests will not yield the desired outcome in terms of the elimination of bugs.

No Testing of the Infrastructure

The spotlight in automated testing is largely on the automation of functional tests. Given this scenario, test automation engineers often fail to consider the potential infrastructure issues during the software development and delivery process. With hardly any testing of infrastructure, some of the infrastructure failures that usually show up include failure in integration points, breakdown of communication with third-party apps, and stoppage in results to API endpoints.

High Costs Involved in Update of Test Automation

One of the biggest challenges of automated testing is the costs of maintenance. Test automation needs to be updated each time the software is changed or updated, else automated tests cannot be re-run successfully. Typically, re-running the tests manually after software change involves comparatively less effort than updating the automated tests. Hence, a number of organizations discontinue their automation initiatives because of substantial maintenance costs. By partnering with a knowledgeable and expert company that excels at automated / software testing, will get your business several advantages in addition to keeping costs down.

Organizational Problems

Automated testing is usually considered a project issue in which organizational problems are often ignored. An organization in which there are no set standards to ensure that different teams use the testing tools in a consistent manner, chances are that each team may develop its own approach to test automation. This can pose difficulties with regard to the transfer or sharing of automated tests/testers among the teams. It is prudent to outsource the QA and software testing to a professionally run company, with years of experience in this realm.

In Conclusion:

The diverse issues affecting automated testing may make it a futile effort for an organization if automation is performed wrongly and without a structured approach. For automated testing to be effective, it is pertinent that testers remain aware of the challenges that accompany the implementation of automated testing suites. In addition, automated testing should fit the overall test management strategy of an organization so that it does not cause any obstacles / bottlenecks in the software development process. Leave these apprehensions behind by connecting with us today.

Schedule a Call
Schedule a Call
Chat with us
Chat with us