Select Page

Category Selected: Automation Testing

193 results Found


People also read

Blog

Types of Hybrid Automation Frameworks

Blog

AI for QA: Challenges and Insights

Automation Testing

Playwright 1.56: Key Features and Updates

Talk to our Experts

Amazing clients who
trust us


poloatto
ABB
polaris
ooredo
stryker
mobility
Why do Automation Testing Projects Fail?

Why do Automation Testing Projects Fail?

Most companies are affected by some problem or the other in new test automation services projects. Keep such windfalls in mind and build stable automation frameworks and ensure a collaborative team effort and own your automation. For automation to be successful, companies should approach it with realistic goals, the right attitude, and a willingness to make it work. Here are eight reasons your automation project can fail:

Unable to describe individual business goals that need to be solved:Return On Investment (ROI) should be understood if you are running automation tied to a business goal, then business leaders will stay invested. Use an open-source tool and hook it into your build server and spend time making your project feature-rich by writing test cases that are aligned to the same business goal.

Automation should be treated as a timed activity and not a process:Make sure developers who build the automation framework hand it over to a competent technical QA team to carry forward. Automation is a software project and should be flexible and easy to maintain. Continuous work needs to be done to update the framework, like new updates, features, and requirements. Most frameworks are tied into other systems like build, metrics, and cloud services, so keep it synced as it evolves.

A team creates it without sole responsibility for standards:Slower test case development by a smaller team that builds in redundancy and regularly reviews and gives feedback to produce quicker value to the project. This team checks requirements, understand business goals, and builds infrastructure to drive the project forward. With strong leadership, an approved roadmap, and strict quality controls, the team should be confident in their tests and its ability to produce reliable results. Each test should be reviewed to ensure it fits, and the team’s QA engineers should be autonomous.

Understand what to and what not to automate:It is imperative to understand that it is good to automate certain functionalities of a webpage and that some scenarios are better tested manually. Only automate stable aspects of your app or web product that is not prone to change but needs to be continuously retested. Save valuable testing effort by automating such repetitive tasks and ensure testers spend time performing exploratory testing.

The team isn’t technically skilled enough to handle the project:Testers should have a certain level of technical expertise to do automation the right way. Such QA team members can be expensive, and not all companies can afford to hire such automation engineers. So hire a few technical experts, but if it isn’t an option, invest in a tool that can help you automate the processes.

Lack of visibility around automation techniques:To be more visible, create an automation document listing all features automated, modules covered, and framework set up. Your method of automation should be clearly defined for the entire Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC). Automation tasks need to be treated separately to make them easier to manage. Make the results visible to the whole team via dashboards and discuss daily progress in team huddles. Conduct sessions that cover different trends, ethical practices, and tools. Make your automation a collaborative effort by involving the complete team in planning and writing it.

Check the testability of the application:Build an application that is easily testable from all (unit, system, integration, and acceptance) levels. Don’t build complex applications that cannot be tested and ensure the testability of a story, feature, or requirement during backlog sprucing, and sprint planning meetings before the development begins. It will alleviate problems later in the SDLC.

Vague automation goals:A robust automation framework seamlessly integrates with Continuous Integration/Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) pipeline, is easily maintainable because it gives quick feedback and runs consistently. Identify two or three high-level functionalities and collect input from automating and stabilizing them first. Separate your automation suites for smoke tests (run after every code check-in) and regression tests (run daily and covers different functionalities).

In summary, these common reasons that cause automation to fail need to be avoided for a successful automation implementation. Keep your projects focused on increasing ROI and business value and hire a highly skilled team or test automation company to ensure a smooth transition. Automation testing companies, like Codoid, can help you in this respect.

Must-use Automation Testing Metrics

Must-use Automation Testing Metrics

Automation Testing success can be measured using its metrics. Analyzing only the last execution results will not help you to determine test automation success completely. In order to achieve better results, you need to save all the historical execution results to enable automation testing metrics. For example: if you want to know how many times a feature is passed and failed, then you will have to ingest each execution’s test result in a database and create a web dash board. So that your team can see what benefits we have reaped so far from automated testing.

As a leading automation testing company, while formulating test automation metrics we consider the following two crucial aspects.

  • Automation Testing Benefits perspective.
  • Script Quality Perspective. if an automated script keeps on providing false-positives, then it will be an indication for automation testing team to make the script robust enough to stop false positives. Let’s see all the required automation testing metrics one by one.

Pass and Fail Count

Pass and Fail count from last execution helps to conclude the testing. However, if you get more failures, then automation testers should troubleshoot the failures. If a failure is a false positive, then check how many times the script failed in the past and mark it for the update. When sharing the historical failures count, your team only focuses is to stop false positives.

Automation Testing Coverage

Automation testing starts from the senior management. They are the one who approve the budget to kick-off automation testing project to reap benefits from it. As soon as the project is started, sharing how many scripts are converted from manual to automation on weekly basis is a vital information for the management team. Consider, 30% of test cases are not automated due to various reasons. your team can plan how much effort is required for manual regression testing for the non automated test cases.

No. of executions

If you have automated test suite, then it should be utilized as much as possible for various testing activities. No. of executions is a great metric for your team and management. Once the regression testing is taken care by automation, the testers from your team will get more time to conduct exploratory testing and to test new features, stories, & other impacted areas manually. No. of times the automated test suite executed metric is an input to your management team to measure the success of test automation.

Failure Count

This metric is useful to enhance scripts quality. How? If you are capturing failure count for Feature, Scenario, and Step level, then you can easily identify automated scripts which are failing often. When your test automation suite is robust enough, then it will add more value to your testing.

Execution Duration

Execution duration metric is an input for your team and management. Let’s see how is it valuable to the management team? If everyone in your team is aware of how quickly your automated smoke and regression test suites complete the execution, then your team can take important decision on how many hours/minutes do we need to show up maintenance page during product release deployment? And how many hours do we need to wait to complete the regression testing on lower environments? Even your team can revisit the scripts to fine tune to reduce the execution time.

Conclusion

We recommend you not to execute your automation testing scripts without collecting metrics. Doing so will be a great value add to your project. You can capture many metrics. However, as a first step, capturing the test automation metrics which are mandatory and useful is important. As a test automation services company, we collect metrics to make the effort visible to clients, and the management so as to improve the scripts’ quality.

How to Launch your Test Automation Pilot Project?

How to Launch your Test Automation Pilot Project?

Before starting an automation test project to automate regression test suite and end-to-scenarios, a pilot project will give one a much needed confidence and helps to design test automation framework with all the required features. In this blog article, we would like to through some light on all the key areas an automation testing team needs to focus during a test automation pilot project.

Automation Testing POC

Ensure that you conduct automation testing proof of concept nevertheless you have an expert team with vast experience in test automation. The proof what you are going to collect is for the software under test not for your team.

Test Automation POC steps:

  • Identify critical test scenarios.
  • Choose a right tool.
  • Setup an automation testing framework with basic features.
  • Write POC test scripts.
  • Capture the challenges faced during POC.
  • Execute the developed automated test scripts on the recommended browsers and devices.
  • Demonstrate the POC to the management team and stakeholders.
  • As a final step, publish the POC report.

Identify a subset of Regression Test Suite

Test Automation POC is a checkpoint. If you have got a positive outcome from the proof of concept, then proceed with the next steps. As an automation testing company, we have seen successes in automation testing after conducting POCs and pilot projects. As a next step, identify a subset of Regression Test Suite for the pilot project.

Automation Testing Framework Design

This is a vital step. You need a test automation architect to design a framework which has all the required features to ease automation script development. When you design a test automation framework, ask the following questions yourself:

  • How and where am I going to manage Feature files/automated test scripts?
  • Test Data File formats?
  • How to implement framework to automate Web app, Mobile App, and Desktop App?
  • How to use Automation Patterns?
  • What are all the preliminary variables required in framework configuration file?
  • How does the framework report the failures with screenshots?
  • How to collect test automation metrics?
  • How to run a script with multiple test data?
  • How to handle API automation testing?

A good framework eases script development and enable effective collaboration.

Automate the identified test cases for the pilot project

Start automating the identified test cases for the pilot project. Execute the automated test scripts multiple times and make the reports visible to management and stakeholders. A well-planned pilot project gives a sound foundation for automation. If your scripts are not producing false positives and negatives after several executions, you can confidently proceed with full regression test suite automation.

Should you Invest in Combined or Separate Teams for Test Automation?

Should you Invest in Combined or Separate Teams for Test Automation?

In the software industry, there is a constant dispute that surrounds test automation and who can be involved in the design, creation, and maintenance of it. Under various scenarios, there are different degrees of success for the team, product, and company, depending on who within the team does it. When the team uses Test-Driven Development (TDD), developers write code at the unit level to get quick feedback while the QA testers write code to verify higher-level integration layers.

teams for test automation

Developers write these unit tests to verify Javascript validation of inputs in the browser and integration tests to check server-side validation of content. QA testers write web driver tests driving the browser for a full-stack validation to ensure that the end-user is talking to the server. The team should code in a maintainable format, and existing tests or any refactoring happens on work in progress, testing frameworks, naming libraries, and patterns used. A cohesive team would build tests according to the pyramid testing stack, and every layer would have different criteria.

The principles for test automation are readability, robustness, and speed. It is a complex process that continually evolves the testing infrastructure along with the product in the development phase. It includes unit tests of the validation in Javascript, integration tests of the server-side validation and data persistence, and a journey test to ensure the new page connects with the data flows as expected. The developers use these scenarios as part of their TDD work, and the QA performs exploratory testing when functionality is available, providing feedback until they meet acceptance criteria. Developers need to be involved in all of the test stacks so that they can refactor existing tests and add new ones without duplication. The QA team provides valuable input on what to test, and the testing infrastructure is built accordingly.

Advantages of a separate test automation team:

  • The team shares knowledge on updates to the framework code and review of new tools and libraries together.
  • This reduces duplicate code, and most core modules are reused and shared for other tests.
  • The team contributes to and uses a consolidated test automation framework.
  • Team members work in isolation without daily scrum meetings and can focus entirely on automation work.
  • Each team member is assigned to a scrum team, and they help each other out when automation becomes complex.
  • The QA team can focus on updating and refactoring the framework to facilitate and simplify the scripting of test code.

As an automation testing services company, Codoid knows the importance of having a dedicated team that not only develops the product but is also involved in the testing process after that. It is ideal if both teams are separate, but it is also imperative that both teams are well-integrated and highly skilled to ensure that times to market and project deadlines are achieved. That’s why we believe companies should focus on their developmental process and leave testing to a test automation services company that uses advanced tools, techniques, and methodologies.

Guidelines to maintain your Test Automation Suite

Guidelines to maintain your Test Automation Suite

It is necessary to manage testing efforts by creating test suites for your assets. To facilitate, you should introduce a Test Automation Suite. It doesn’t make testing more accessible and may increase maintenance. That’s why many software testing companies are undecided about the need for test automation even though it has become a necessity in the Software Development Lifecycle process (SDLC) to reduce time. Development and Quality Assurance (QA) teams are depending on automated checks to make sure that the software is delivered in shorter durations and exceed end-user quality expectations. Companies have started to realize that executing accurate automated tests is a worthy investment to advance their testing processes further.

You should be wary of the causes of diminished returns on your test automation investment to leverage your test automation suite. Like trying to force tools to do actions, it can’t because it can lead to poor results. Make QA engineers/testers aware of all tool features so that you can have an efficient implementation at a higher ROI. The following guidelines will allow you to facilitate the maintenance of your automated test suites.

Test Automation Suite

Plan the test suite

Planning increases the chances of testing being productive, and it is an essential part of the strategy for test automation. It articulates to the developers how you plan to maintain test assets. Use test tooling to capture data and treat this like any other asset in your test repository.

Run enough automated tests

Automated tests will give higher ROI if you run them frequently and will have three benefits:

  • Reduced overall application cost
  • Quality feedback is more often
  • Easier to detect, analyze, and fix defects.
  • Tests run in a stable manner

Centrally locate your test assets

Position test assets in a repository that can be easily accessed by developers with test management tools to facilitate maintenance of the test suites to ensure integrity.

Create with maintainability in mind

When creating automated tests, keep reliability at the fore of your decision while building your production code. Else, the time taken for the following will increase:

  • Updating tests to reflect the current state.
  • Analyzing failed tests and finding out you’re test was not up to date. You don’t want automation to become a burden when it was meant to be an accelerator.

Test assets treated like any other software

Test cases and test scripts should be maintained, and it can be of various kinds for automated test suites. During the lifecycle of your test suites, identify and plan the test suite maintenance. Whether corrective, preventative, or adaptive maintenance.

Improve the testability of test suites

Use test suites to communicate decisions to your developers and testers to perform continuous perfective maintenance and consider test suites as assets to both teams.

Learn the craft

To get maximum ROI from test automation, understand that it is a craft, and the implementation requires specific expertise despite the use of automation tools that can help create, maintain, and execute automated tests.

Clean up test suites

Maintain test suites by consistently checking if test assets are valid. During maintenance, cultivate a practice with developers and testers to create packages for obsolete tests or test suites and label them.

That’s why if you’re struggling with this, you should reach out to a qualified automation testing services company like Codoid, and you can guarantee your clients a smooth transition to test automation suites. Only skilled test automation services companies ensure they are up to date with the latest in technology and trends, and their QA and development teams adopt and implement the best practices that are sure to maximize your ROI.

Why Would Test Automation Fail?

Why Would Test Automation Fail?

Test automation has become the obvious choice in most projects and for testing teams. As companies grow, their products become better and also more complex, leading to the need of better and more efficient non-regression test planning. Manual testing in such cases would need a large dedicated team, which would prove beyond the budgets of most projects. This leads to the requirement of meticulous automated tests. As a leading Automation Testing Services Company we know that while automating tests prove to be an advantage, there are several reasons why test automation would fail. As the experts, we know that comprehending these reasons would prevent pitfalls, and we list some of the reasons for better understanding.

Unworkable Expectations from Automated Testing Tools

There will be times when the product and or the tools fail to live up to the project expectations, and usually, the tools are blamed. The reason is that maybe the expectations of the automated tool used were inaccurate or more than it could have delivered. At the start, project owners make the mistake of believing that investing in a pre-scripted leading tool would get them instant ROI and all would enable all at the click of a button. Additionally, there are instances when project owners believe that the software would be able to automate the entire process across the project. It is necessary to understand that to put an automated testing tool to good use is a project in itself and requires meticulous planning and experimentation to ensure that it works across a range of testing environments.

How much and what to Automate

While a company may understand that total automation is not possible, they are unable to assess how must and what to automate to really achieve what they want from their software product. Even an expert would be unable to pinpoint the exact percentage or figure that would be adequate for automation tests – it depends on the application being offered and the needs to which business would be catering – an animated web application would be different to an e-commerce one.

Why Would Test Automation Fail

‘Umbrella’ mindset

This mindset is one of the major causes of test automation failure. A one size fits all approach would prove detrimental and test automation would never work as per expectations. The aim instead should be towards updating to match changing factors, maintaining patience, and ensuring continuous improvement.

Lack of Understanding of Manual Testing

It is important to know that treating automated testing as a silver bullet is an incorrect and flawed approach. Automated testing is an extension of manual testing, and without understanding the manual method, the automated process would not fall into place.

Flawed Understanding of Automated Testing

The most common mistake that project owners and businesses make is to believe that automated testing does not require inputs and is extremely simple to undertake. It is incorrect to believe that an existing process for testing can simply be automated without a reconsideration of the entire approach.

Inadequate Resource Planning and Incorrect Staff Selection

It is a fallacy to believe that any tester or person involved in developing a product can run automated tests. It takes experts with specific skill sets to undertake designing, configuration, and implementation of test automation, as also excellent communication skills between project managers, developers, and the end client. Businesses must work with vendors consisting of teams with extensive and varied technical knowledge, and must not rely on inexperienced in-house staff.

Inadequate Attention Towards Test Reporting

The most accurate and meticulous testing would not be complete without thorough test report documents. Inexperienced teams would not pay the required attention to test reporting and analysis. The flawed analysis could lead to unattended defects, and be the cause of wasted precious time, resources, and efforts. It is important to remember that assuming the success of test results can lead to problems and lead to test automation failure.

Flawed Test Code

Despite meticulously following all testing strategies and steps, if test automation still fails, it could be because of test code errors, and it would be wise to relook at the test scripts.

In Conclusion

Boosting productivity is important for any company, and enhancing the quality of your product is what is required, and test automation is certainly the most efficient way to do so. The fact is that test automation enhances the quality and robustness of the software, provided it is implemented with caution and care. In order to reap the benefits and ensure no obstacles, businesses need to invest in an experienced team that can gain for them all the benefits that test automation has to offer. Connect with us to work with such a team and ensure hassle-free testing.