Select Page

Category Selected: E-Learning Testing

23 results Found

People also read

API Testing

Postman API Automation Testing Tutorial

Automation Testing

Top 10 AI Automation Testing Tools

Automation Testing

Talk to our Experts

Amazing clients who
trust us

Top Tips for E-Learning QA Testing

Top Tips for E-Learning QA Testing

ELearning testing is a complex and unique process. Verifying the learnability of the content is critical, and requires domain experts with years of experience to plan the test approach. Learnability is defined as the overall quality of interfaces and products, which in turns makes it easier for users to understand them and use all the functionalities and features.

Learnability therefore is quintessential to e-learning and content usability, and becomes extremely important in e-learning domain testing. A reputed QA company with customized automation testing frameworks, in-depth experience working with both commercial and open source learning, would be the partner needed to help your business to evolve the content on the e-learning platform.

Tips for E-Learning QA Testing

Making E-learning Testing a Success

E-learning domain testing is complex – even though it may seem easy. Software testing play a dominant and critical role in the content development of e-learning courses. The slightest errors and minutest of bugs can snowball into bigger issues, and thus e-learning domain testing requires a structure and deft handling, only possible with a top class software testing company. We give you some tips to ensure that when you do start e-learning testing, the process is seamless and quick.

Use the services of a top notch software testing company to review the content in order to get a fresh perception of the developed E-Learning course – this will ensure that any errors / bugs will be easily identified. A ‘fresh set of eyes’ will provide an unbiased view, ensuring that any defects and shortcomings are quickly done away with. Of course, those who are given this task must be reliable and your data should be safe with them – hence choose a trustworthy and reputed company for this purpose.

E-learning is a huge responsibility since the content would be aimed at shaping young minds and hence the e-learning platform and content must be of the highest quality. It is therefore necessary that the performance of this platform too must undergo meticulous testing – making performance testing a quintessential part of e-learning domain testing. It is the responsibility of the company to ensure the platform runs smoothly, and is easy to understand and use. A high quality user experience will gain more business and enhance the reputation of your company.

The advantage of using experts for e-learning testing lies in the fact that they would suggest several and unique methods of testing your company’s e-learning platform. This would provide a holistic approach to testing, and ensure that the users find the platform running smoothly at all times, irrespective of the time of day or night they access it.

Several different testing methods will help to fill any gaps and maintain optimum ‘health’ of the e-learning platform – happy users would spread the word about your company, thereby getting you more visibility and subsequent business.

An easy to navigate e-learning platform with clear instructions, mobility, different browser compatibility, and with flawless and engaging content should be the aim of an e-learning platform – only the best in class e-learning testers can help you achieve this goal.

The Rise and Rise of E-Learning Applications

The e-learning segment is rising and is one of the fastest growing sectors, given the ease of delivering content to students through top class tutors and mentors, and the convenience of learning at any time and even from the comfort of home. E-learning is poise to change the face of education, given the many learning solutions and innovative content – hence it makes business sense to invest in a good quality e-learning testing company. An expert team can add value and make any e-learning platform superior – flash based, web-based, CD Rom based, and server based.

In Conclusion:

Given the popularity it is obvious that e-learning sites are increasing in number, thereby adding to the number of competitors your business would have. However, in the long run only those e-learning sites will succeed that fulfill all the criteria mentioned, and are able to achieve consistent customer satisfaction. Connect with us now in order to remain a top notch and leading e-learning business platform.

ELearning Testing Strategies

ELearning Testing Strategies

As digitisation pervades every sphere of our lives, it has also opened up new opportunities for students and educators in the education and corporate /training spaces. Electronic resources now form a large part of the process of learning and the transfer of knowledge and skills in schools, colleges, correspondence courses and distance learning as well as in workplaces. As such eLearning testing is now a vital requirement within the eLearning space. ELearning domain testing has become one of the most sought-after quality assurance or QA Services that software testing companies are called upon to provide today.

Why eLearning testing has become so important

Research shows us that the human mind is better able to absorb material that engages more than one sense. While it is only the teacher’s voice and letters/ numbers written on a board engages the visual and auditory faculties of students in a traditional setup, eLearning can do much more. The moving pictures, interactive learning sessions help to engage the brain more effectively and for longer, resulting in more effective learning. Hence it becomes vital for an eLearning testing service to determine the usability, efficacy and stability of any eLearning system or program to promote effective retention and recall. More and more educational institutions and corporate training systems, are incorporating technological aids into the curriculum.

ELearning testing strategies that QA companies use

A QA company will examine various aspects of an eLearning app or system. Testing involves much more than just proofreading the material and checking it for grammar, syntax and factual accuracy. The testing process will see how effectively the material/ curriculum has been covered, how easily accessible it is to students and educators and to employees and their trainers.

ELearning Testing Strategies

The most important thing for QA professionals to examine is learnability and whether course content needs tweaking to improve the framework of the program. Suggestions about best practices to help students retain learning more effectively may be made in the process. It isn’t enough to examine that the course material is covered. ELearning testing protocols will also examine the learning design to ensure that students /trainees receive information in the most engaging and interesting manner; for the most effective retention and recall.

It is also important to examine the visual design of an eLearning program. This is because aspects such as the use of colour, space, font, graphics and multimedia can enhance or detract from the efficacy of the eLearning process on the whole. The process of quality assurance will also examine the logical structure of the eLearning course. Ease of navigation, cross referencing, annotations, making content searchable, and overall consistency are vital aspects that software testing companies will examine.

Testers would also typically involve more than one set of parameters for testing and perform comprehensive checks and reviews to get the best results. Testers would also have to be vigilant about the stability and security of the program.

ELearning Testing Strategies

Any performance glitches, vulnerabilities to bugs and malfunctions would have to be identified and addressed. During eLearning domain testing, a QA company will examine now quick and responsive an eLearning website and will also check how well it works while on the Cloud. For instance, the operating system, devices and browsers used will all be tested to ensure compatibility.

ELearning testing can automate regression testing for quick feedback, identify and address performance bottlenecks. All of these can contribute vastly to the ultimate success of an eLearning program and to the success of all those who use and depend upon it! Connect with us to help us accelerate the success you so rightly deserve.

ELearning App Technical Glitches

ELearning App Technical Glitches

Importance of ELearning App Testing

If an elearning app/course is ready for deployment, then it needs to be tested thoroughly to avoid technical glitches. For example: If 5000 students are taking an online exam concurrently on an ELearning platform, the performance of the app should be checked before deployment.

As we are expertise in ELearning testing, we strongly recommend to test your e-Learning apps on multiple browsers & real devices and conduct load testing before going live.

The following blog post lists few popular elearning app tech glitches to understand the impacts and why is it so important to test E-Learning platforms?

TN Ready

TNReady is the state’s annual test to measure what students know and are able to do. It’s important because it serves as the cornerstone of Tennessee’s accountability system, with student growth scores incorporated into teacher evaluations and intervention strategies for low-performing schools.

As soon as the test began on, screens froze and students could not advance beyond the login page. Technical workers for the state and Questar (Leading assessment company in the US) scrambled to fix the problem only a week after the testing company dealt with similar issues in New York. Several hours later, they pinpointed a conflict in two state testing programs that share a login system, McQueen (Education Commissioner) emphasized that the state’s computer server did not “crash,” nor was there a capacity issue.

The problem was widespread, however, affecting students in at least 20 counties across Tennessee and in large districts in Memphis, Nashville, Knoxville, Chattanooga, and Murfreesboro. He said a software patch fixed the problem (was their claim), Tennessee scrapped its computerized exams later, returning to the paper-and-pencil version when schools recorded a number of problems on the first day of testing.


Testing based on Common Core Standard (is an educational initiative from 2010 that details what K–12 students throughout the United States should know in English language arts and mathematics at the conclusion of each school grade) : State-wide Impact.

As most states in the US have moved to new standardized tests based on the Common Core during the past two years, many also have switched from administering those tests the old-fashioned way — with paper and No. 2 pencils — to delivering them online using computers, laptops and tablets.

But the shift to computer-based testing has been riddled with technical glitches that have spanned many testing companies and states, including those that have adopted Common Core and those using other new academic standards.

Stressed-out students have found they sometimes can’t log on to their exams or are left to panic when their answers suddenly disappear. Frustrated teachers have had to come up with last-minute lesson plans when testing fails. Some school systems — and even entire states — have had to abandon testing altogether because of Internet hiccups thousands of miles away.

Some states — including California, with the nation’s largest student enrolment — have been pleased, calling their shift to online testing surprisingly smooth and effective. But the balky tests in numerous other states raise a broader question: Can the exams — which are supposed to offer an objective view of student achievement — produce the kind of valid, reliable results that are necessary for a fair judgment of the performance of schools, teachers and students?

When the testing administration system is dysfunctional, the results are suspect, if not useless,” said Bob Schaeffer, the public education director at FairTest, a nonprofit organization that serves as a national watchdog on and frequent critic of K-12 testing. Malfunctions have disrupted computerized testing in more than 30 states since 2013, according to media reports compiled by FairTest

“The theory of standardized testing is that students are given equivalent questions in the same format and the same way,” Schaeffer (Public Education Director) said. “When you have some kids having a smooth testing experience and others having repeated disruptions, it’s no longer standardized.”

In March 2016, the state education chief in Texas called that state’s testing experience “simply unacceptable” after technical hiccups appeared to erase students’ answers on more than 14,000 exams.

Alaska officials this month cancelled all K-12 standardized testing for the year, citing “chaos” in schools because of repeated testing disruptions. The state was the victim of a freak accident: Someone operating a backhoe inadvertently severed a fiber-optic cable in Kansas, cutting the Last Frontier’s connection to its test vendor, the Achievement and Assessment Institute at the University of Kansas.

In Nevada last year, officials accused test vendor Measured Progress of breach of contract after a massive meltdown in the state’s new computer-based test. Students had trouble logging on and were repeatedly booted off the system; state officials allowed districts to stop testing via computer after two sincere attempts, and ultimately, just 30 percent of students completed their exams.

Nevada’s superintendent of public instruction, said he does not know exactly what went wrong, saying the cause of the problem could have been a problematic piece of code, a lack of server capacity or something else. But the problem came from Measured Progress, he said, not from schools or districts, which had been testing IT infrastructure for months.

“We’re not smart enough to know what failed where, but we know our test experience was not what we paid for,” Canavero said

Two other clients of New Hampshire-based Measured Progress, North Dakota and Montana, also experienced widespread technical problems last year. A spokesman for Measured Progress declined to comment.

Nevada ultimately reached a $1.3 million settlement with Measured Progress (a leader among K-12 educational assessment companies) and this year chose a new vendor, Data Recognition Corp. Testing has been smooth so far in Nevada this spring, Canavero said. But last year’s problems mean that the state was not able to measure student performance in a meaningful way.

Testing for students in Virginia was disrupted last year because a server reached its storage capacity, according to Pearson, the multinational publishing company that is Virginia’s test vendor.

Minnesota, another client of Pearson’s, saw widespread delays and problems last year because of what Pearson said was a denial-of-service attack, a deliberate action by hackers seeking to overload servers and slow their performance.

Annual State English Exams

Many children across New York couldn’t take the annual state English exams because technical glitches blocked some schools from testing on computers.

Schools have several days to administer the tests so they can reschedule, but the problem added stress and inconvenience at a time when anxiety runs high for some families and teachers. State officials said Questar Assessment Inc., the test vendor, were delayed in delivering the tests electronically to some students in the morning, but it was unclear how many were affected. District leaders said some students who started testing had trouble submitting answers.

Online Testing Glitches Causing Distrust in Technology

Some districts turn to paper assessments.

Florida, Kansas, and Oklahoma all suspended online testing at some point during testing windows in the month of April 2014 because of computer glitches that led to slow load times or kicked students out of the assessment systems. Indiana districts reported problems during the week of April 21, as they did practice testing, but, as of mid-week last week, officials from the state’s department of education reported that only one district was beset by significant glitches.

In each of those states, the testing problems were attributed to the assessment provider. In Oklahoma, where 8,100 students in grades 6-12 experienced disruptions, the trouble arose from CTB/McGraw-Hill, which reported a hardware malfunction. That same issue was blamed for problems in Indiana, which also contracts with Monterey, Calif.-based CTB/McGraw-Hill, during the practice-testing period.
In Florida, where 26 of 67 districts reported a variety of disruptions, test-provider Pearson, based in New York City, cited “degraded administrative functions” and quickly fixed the problems, said Joe Follick, a spokesman for the state’s department of education. And early in April, Kansas education officials were forced to suspend administration of state exams after testing vendor the Center for Education Testing and Evaluation, based at the University of Kansas, in Lawrence, was overwhelmed with attacks from unidentified hackers.

Mr. Ballard faulted state Superintendent of Public Instruction Janet Barresi for awarding a $13 million contract to CTB/McGraw-Hill this year after last year’s problems. At that time, Oklahoma education officials did not believe there was time to rebid the contract, said Tricia Pemberton, a spokeswoman for the Oklahoma education department. Last year, CTB/McGraw-Hill paid more than $1.2 million to the state to cover damages suffered by students and teachers during testing.

Difference between eLearning Testing and Application Testing

Difference between eLearning Testing and Application Testing

Difference between eLearning Testing and Application Testing The job of a software testing company is to test any software program for how stable, efficient, functional and useable it is. Within the job description of a QA company fall several different types of testing such as automation testing, eLearning testing, mobile application testing, ETL & data-centric testing and performance testing. It falls to a quality assurance services provider to improve product quality, add value and give businesses commensurate returns on their investment. We look at two testing modalities that businesses commonly require QA testing for – eLearning and app testing – as well as the difference between the two.

What is eLearning testing? A QA company would be called upon to test an eLearning program mainly to gauge its ‘learnability’. The aim is to ensure that a student or educator would be able to easily navigate the program, access the course material and get help with understanding and internalising concepts.

Earlier, CD-ROM based learning programs proliferated the market, where now there is a huge diversification in the eLearning space offering users many more options. There are web based learning courses including SCORM (shareable content object reference model), flash based applications and server based learning management systems to choose from.

Difference between eLearning Testing

A QA testing company would frequently be called upon for eLearning testing particularly owing to the high level of digitisation of the education system. The easy availability of the internet data and a device in every hand has resulted in an exponential growth in the eLearning space. This makes it imperative for QA services to ensure comprehensive testing to facilitate defect-free products that dovetail with customer requirements and ensure a faster time to market.

What is app testing? Companies providing QA services are most frequently called upon to test applications for the web, PC, mobile phone and other devices. The aim is to find any errors in the software, detect vulnerabilities and save on development time while lowering costs. Apps are created for assisting with specific business tasks, for entertainment, leisure, fitness, gaming etc., and may have a wider range of uses and users than eLearning programs.

Difference between eLearning testing and app testing While both types of testing do appear similar there are subtle differences in the approach to both types of testing. Both types of testing benefit from the input of a software testing services provider who would be able to examine the software from a fresh perspective; sans bias and with a tester’s rigour and eye for potential problems. Testing is important also to ensure that there is no hindrance to end user experience. The test team would employ different manual and automated methodologies to detect current as well as potential lacunae and glitches. Testers also perform the invaluable task of testing the software for compatibility with various platforms and devices to ensure workability.

Whether it is eLearning testing or app testing, roping in the experts is always advisable. This is because a one size fits all approach cannot work for every scenario. Each testing process has to be approached individually and a unique testing process must be decided upon for the best possible outcomes.

E-Learning Compliance

E-Learning Compliance

E-Learning Compliance


E-learning is an increasingly popular concept for training the global workforce. E-Learning industry has attained exponential growth in a very short span of time because it has become a medium of choice which has changed the education landscape by providing standard learning solutions and caters to the needs of users of different types like learners, tutors, training managers and administrators.

At the early stages, these Learning Management Systems (LMS) were restricted to cross domain limitations, no elaborate reporting and it is all about just engaging content, now it has become more advanced like activity tracking, allows to do in-depth analysis, course sequencing, mobile friendly. Since the distribution of these applications become wide spread like supporting cross domains, online content and digitization, it is important to standardize their integration to ensure an effective communication among systems.

Why to follow these Standards?

As humans belong to different languages, cultures and origin follows a set of standards like signs, emoticons, icons and symbols to communicate across boundaries or to display those standard signs at place where large number of people gather.


LMS need certain standards to communicate with each other and with the content they manage.

An Instructional Designer definitely plays a vital role in designing the course and should follow the standards to give a high quality course material to the users. An Instructional Designer should be very careful to make a decision because it is not just to pick a standard which supports the training courses but also they should consider that it should run seamlessly with their Learning Management System (LMS). We will see a brief overview of each standards or protocols and will break down the differences between them in detail below.


AICC was the first standard developed for e-Learning by the Aviation Industry Computer based training Committee (AICC). This was designed for CD-ROM and LAN based training. It allows content to be hosted on a separate server and supports highly secure HTTPS data transfers.

AICC uses HTML forms and text strings to transfer information between course content and the LMS.

AICC Compliant systems can :

  • 1. Support highly secure HTTPS data transfer between content and LMS.
  • 2. Allows Contents to be hosted on separate server.


SCORM stands for Sharable Content Object Reference Model, is a standard created by the Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) initiative, a US government program. It is a technical standard for e-Learning software solutions which defines communication between client side content and LMS. SCORM’s predecessor, AICC has problem with integrating courses with a delivery framework unless the content was tailored to a specific platform. This entails to a time consuming process which leads to high deployment costs.

SCORM overcomes those issues and makes the content sequencing straightforward and user friendly. The designer can add things like dynamic text, pop up mini quizzes and navigation specification. Another important feature is, SCORM makes easy migration of courses from an old system to a new one so it is easy for the Instructional Designers to create a course content on their own or buying courses from a third party.

SCORM compliant systems can :

  • 1. Track course completion and time spent.
  • 2. Monitor and report the pass/ fail results.
  • 3. Publish and play content across any platform.
  • 4. Transfer content between multiple LMS whenever needed.
  • 5. Offer single score reports.

Tin Can

Tin Can, also known as Experience API (xAPI) is an Open Source e-Learning specification developed after AICC and SCORM. This has become more popular compliant for e-learning applications because it is mobile friendly which plays back smoothly on smartphones and tablets, stores data online, offline and much more. An xAPI-enabled learning activities generate statements, or records of e-learning. When an user performs a learning activity, the xAPI activity statement is recorded and stored in a learning record store (LRS).

The main function of the LRS is to store and retrieve the data that is generated from Experience API Statements. The LRS can communicate learner data with other systems such as LMS, Sensor enabled devices and mobile devices. These LRSs can be stand alone components of an eLearning environment or can reside within LMS solutions.

Some advantages of Tin Can are:

  • 1. Greater control over e-Learning content.
  • 2. No dependency on LMS
  • 3. Capable to view in-depth assessment results.
  • 4. Browser free operability
  • 5. Ability to record any activity, mouse click, answers, etc.
  • 6. No cross domain restrictions
  • 7. Advanced portability due to LRS.
  • 8. Enhanced security.